Profiting from “Playing God”


Sightings from The Catbird Seat

~ o ~

December 17, 2006

The Drudge Report has had headlines about this scandal several times lately:

Rich Israelis Seeking ‘Rejuvenation’
Linked To Horrifically Murdered
Ukrainian Babies

By: Sorcha Faal, What Does It Mean?

In a World gone completely insane, there are very few reports we research that truly shock us on all levels as human beings, today one such report has shaken us all due to its sheer horrific brutality, the murdering and butchery of new-born babies for their stem cells and internal organs so that rich Westerners are able to have what are called ‘Rejuvenation’ treatments.

From today’s FSB reports there is apparent confirmation supporting the allegations made by one of Ukraine’s top prosecutors, Irina Bogomolova, who was dismissed from her investigation involving the murdering of newborn babies for their stem cells and organs, and as also confirmed by Western media sources, and as we can read as reported by Britain’s Telegraph News Service in their article titled “Stem cell baby deaths probe ‘too close to the truth’, claims investigator“, and which says:

“A Ukrainian investigator looking into claims that new-born babies were killed to harvest their stem cells and internal organs says she was removed from the case after demanding that the inquiry be extended to all Ukraine’s maternity hospitals. Irina Bogomolova, who works in the chief prosecutor’s office in the capital, Kiev, claims she was taken off the case because she came too close to the truth while investigating allegations made by women who claim their babies were taken away from them immediately after birth.

She said: “I was sacked for political reasons. I demanded an investigation into all maternity wings in hospitals across Ukraine and I was relieved of duty after making that demand. “A trade in stem cells exists here… I suspect there is a lot of bribery going on, right up to highest levels.” Pregnant women, especially from rural areas, are very vulnerable targets as they will obviously believe whatever the doctors tell them. It’s easy to take their babies from them and tell them they died or were born dead due to complications.”

The Council of Europe is to investigate allegations that newborn babies, and foetuses, have been killed to provide stem cells and internal organs for controversial medical and cosmetic treatments. Officials of the Strasbourg-based human rights organisation are to travel to Ukraine in February to investigate the role played by some of the country’s research centres and maternity hospitals in the international trade.”

Even more disturbing about these reports are the ‘links’ provided between numerous Ukrainian Maternity Hospitals and Israel’s pharmaceutical giant Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.*, who are alleged to be the purchasers of these murdered babies stem cells, and organs, through its alliance with Jerusalem-based Gamida Cell.

The Gamida Cell Company’s research is described as:

“Gamida Cell is developing drugs based on stem-cell research. Stem cells are primordial cells, early in development and non-differentiated. In response to biochemical stimuli (that are not well understood), the stem cells differentiate into specific ones, such as heart, nerve, muscle, epidermis and so on.”

To the actual process of older humans being able to be rejuvenated by the stem cells of babies we can read:

“According to modern science, there are no natural laws preventing successful rejuvenation. Aging is an accumulation of damage to macromolecules, cells, tissues and organs. If any of that damage can be repaired, the result is rejuvenation.

There have been many experiments which have been shown to increase the maximum life span of laboratory animals, thereby achieving life extension. A few experimental methods such as replacing hormones to youthful levels have had considerable success in partially rejuvenating laboratory animals and humans. There are at least eight important hormones that decline with age: 1. human growth hormone (HGH); 2. the sexual hormones: testosterone or estrogen/progesterone; 3. erithropoietin EPO; 4. insulin; 5. DHEA; 6. melatonin; 7. thyroid; 8. pregnenolone. In theory, if all or some of these hormones are replaced, the body will respond to them as it did when it was younger, thus repairing and restoring many body functions. This seems to be borne out in hundreds of thousands of persons who have replaced hormones for many years, especially human growth hormone (HGH, a.k.a. GH).

Most attempts at genetic repair have traditionally involved the use of a retrovirus to insert a new gene into a random position on a chromosome. But by attaching zinc fingers (which determine where transcription factors bind) to endonucleases (which break DNA strands) homologous recombination can be induced to correct and replace defective (or undesired) DNA sequences. The first applications of this technology are to isolate stem cells from the bone marrow of patients having blood disease mutations, to correct those mutations in laboratory dishes using zinc finger endonucleases and to transplant the stem cells back into the patients.

Regenerative medicine uses three different strategies:

Implantation of stem cells from culture into an existing tissue structure

Implantation of stem cells into a tissue scaffold that guides restoration or

Induction of residual cells of a tissue structure to regenerate the necessary body part.”

To the moral implications of the World’s rich being able to extend their lives via the murdering of new-born babies there are no historical counterparts, but does serve as yet another horrific example of how degenerate of Mind and Soul the Western peoples have truly become.

It should also be noted that these FSB reports linking the Israelis, and the Western peoples, to these Ukrainian baby murders could also be a part of the ongoing, and increasing, propaganda war currently underway between Russia and the Western Powers over Russia’s refusal to accept new United Nations laws over the Serbian breakaway region of Kosovo, and which the United States is preparing to us on its own territory for the establishment of their North American Union comprising the Nations of the United States, Mexico and Canada.

© December 17, 2006 EU and US all rights reserved.

(Thanks to V.K. Durham at The Antechamber for this article)


*And who owns Teva Pharmaceutical Industries ?

and…what is their connection with our new Secretary of Defense,
Robert Gates?


March 23, 2003


By Lizette Alvarez, New York Times

DUBLIN, Ireland – When Flonnuala O’Reilly’s baby boy, Michael, who was born with severe birth defects, died at 5 months during exploratory surgery, she asked to be allowed to dress him in his yellow baby outfit.

O’Reilly gave the infant a final hug, then buried him in a white coffin no bigger than a Moses basket.

Five years later, when news organizations reported that hospitals in Dublin had been removing children’s organs during autopsies and storing them for research without the parents’s knowledge, O’Reilly drummed up the courage to call Our Lady’s Hospital for Sick Children in Crumlin, the country’s largest pediatric hospital. In a meeting with hospital officials, she was told that her son’s heart and lungs had, in fact, been “retained.”

“I was being told that my son’s organs are being kept in a bucket of formaldehyde down there,” O’Reilly said.

“My child’s life relegated to a few spare body parts. My beautiful child.”

Since that meeting in 1999, O’Reilly, like hundreds of other parents in Ireland who discovered that their children’s organs had been removed without their knowledge, has sought answers to many questions.

Some were quickly answered: The hospital said it had not asked O’Reilly’s permission to remove the organs because it did not want to further upset her after she had just lost a child. Apologies were made, and the practice stopped. But questions about why the organs were removed and whether anyone profited from the practice await the completion of an independent government inquiry started in 2001.

Now, O’Reilly and other parents, distressed at the slow pace and ineffectiveness at the slow pace and ineffectiveness of that investigation, are demanding a new one, which they say must have subpoena power to compel the hospitals to explain their actions.

At least 50 families, facing a three-year statute of limitations, have also gone to court to retain their right to sue.

Charlotte Yeates, 50, was the first mother to telephone a hospital and ask about her daughter’s organs after she saw a documentary on television about a similar scandal in Bristol, England. After she took her story to the media, others, like O’Reilly, also started making inquiries.

Yeates, O’Reilly and others formed an organization called Parents for Justice, which now includes 800 families, and lobbied hard for information.

The parents found that the removal and use of organs for research dated at least to 1970, and was routine and legal, in about 200 hospitals and other health care facilities. A few hospitals had for small amounts of money sent pituitary glands to pharmaceutical companies that were researching dwarfism.

Some hospitals said that pathologists stored the organs in the hope of preventing similar deaths. They said they did not think there was anything wrong with the practice. It had never been questioned.

“The extent of the organ retention was a shock even to people in the profession,” said Dr. Declan Keane, the head of the National Maternity Hospital in Dublin, which was among the first to return stored organs to parents.

When the government opened its inquiry, it promised a report in six months. Hospital cooperation was voluntary out of concerns about patient confidentiality. Once a report was issued, the Irish Parliament would decide whether to do its own investigation.

But the investigation has lagged. Paul Cantwell, the assistant principal for the Department of Health and Children, is expected to finish the section on pediatric hospitals by the end of the year.

Soon after news broke, the government ordered hospitals to return stored organs and change their policies, and they did. Families began arriving to pick up their children’s organs or to learn that the organs had been burned.

Now families whose children must undergo a post-mortem examination are explicitly asked their permission to remove and store organs for research.


From And the Truth Shall Set You Free, by David Icke:


Ask most people about the master race mentality and they will point to Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. But again, it is not as simple as that.

The plan for a master race and the elimination of ‘lesser’ races did not begin and end in Nazi Germany. It began long before and it is still going on….

This master race mentality is another part of the Elite’s plan for the New World Order. . . . The Nazis were doing and saying publicly what the Elite in Britain and America had been saying and funding long before the word Nazi was even heard of.

EUGENICS is, to quote the Oxford Concise Dictionary, “… the production of fine offspring by the improvement of inherited qualities.”

The term eugenics was coined by the Englishman, Francis Galton, in the later years of the 19th century. He called for society to intervene to maintain racial purity.

Galton wanted the forced sterilisation of the ‘unfit’.

Another ‘pioneer’ of this mindset was Thomas Robert Malthus, born in 1766. It was from him that the theory of the ‘survival of the fittest’ was passed on through Herbert Spencer to Charles Darwin.

Malthus was obsessed with the culling of the population and proposed a series of measures against the ‘lower races’ (the poor), to keep the population down and , as he saw it, to prevent the human genetic stream being dominated by such ‘inferior’ racial lines.

In his best known work, Essay, he suggested that streets should be made narrower and more people crowded into houses, to encourage the return of the plague. Villages should be built next to stagnant pools and, above all, remedies for preventing and curing disease ought to be strongly condemned, he said.

Malthus went on: “We are bound in justice and honour formally to disclaim the right of the poor to support. To this end, I should propose a regulation be made declaring that no child born … should ever be entitled to parish assistance…. The [illegitimate] infant is comparatively speaking, of little value to society, as others will immediately supply its place…. All children beyond what would be required to keep up the population to this [desired] level, must necessarily perish, unless room be made for them by the deaths of grown persons.”

From such a mind did the idea of the ‘survival of the fittest’ emerge, and it has dominated ‘science’ ever since! Add to this the belief that the intellect of a person is genetically determined by the intellect of the parents and you have the eugenics movement, which came to the surface so infamously under the rule of Adolf Hitler….

Names … such as the Harrimans and the Rockefellers, were seriously into eugenics. Averell Harriman’s mother funded the launch of the race-science movement in America in 1910, and built the Eugenics Record Office as a branch of the Galton National Laboratory in London. The Harrimans were responsible for the Bush family fortune and they were close to another Bush family backer, George Herbert Walker (a relative by marriage of Prescott Bush and grandfather to George Bush, who would go on to be President of the United States).

By the late 19th century, some mentally ill people and children were being sterilised by US health officials as a result of eugenics policies. The State of Indiana made the sterilisation of the mentally ill and ‘undesirables’ compulsory and 475 men were sterilised at the Indiana State Reformatory.

After the turn of the century, the Harrimans and Rockefellers spent more than $11 million to establish a eugenics research laboratory at Cold Springs Harbor on Long Island, New York, close to the Dulles brothers’ estates. The study of eugenics was encouraged at the Elite-controlled universities, such as Harvard, Columbia, and Cornell.

In Germany, the same line was taken by Ernst Haeckel, the mystic and Aryan master race promoter, whose ideas would influence Hitler. Haeckel said it was the duty of a nation to enforce breeding, and he and his supporters formed the Monist League to promote their sick beliefs in Germany.

The first International Congress of Eugenics was held in London in 1912. Among its directors were Winston Churchill and Alexander Graham Bell, inventor of the telephone. By 1917, fifteen US States had eugenics laws, and all but a few of them made legal the compulsory sterilisation of epileptics, the mentally ill and retarded, and regular criminals.

In 1932, a year before Hitler and Roosevelt came to power, the Harrimans helped to organise the Third International Congress on Eugenics at the American Museum of Natural History in New York. . . . These wealthy American families, like their counterparts in Britain, feel themselves to be racially superior and they wish to protect their racial purity. This— along with the pursuit of power, wealth, and influence— is the reason why so many intermarriages take place within these families….

The aim of the eugenics movement was, and is, to create a Master Race by the sterilisation and forced birth control of those races considered ‘inferior’.

The International Congress of Eugenics in New York in 1932 tackled the ‘problem’ (as they saw it) of African-Americans and other ‘inferior’ stock reproducing and expanding their numbers. It was decided that the way to deal with this ‘danger’ to the higher races (themselves) was through sterilisation and ‘cutting off the bad stock’.

The Congress was dedicated to the work of Averell Harriman’s mother and Averell did his best to support the proceedings. He personally arranged for the Hamburg-Amerika Shipping Line (controlled by himself, George Walker and Prescott Bush) to transport Nazis from Germany to New York so they could take part in the Congress. The best known of them was Dr. Ernst Rudin, a psychiatrist at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Genealogy and Demography in Berlin. There he occupied an entire floor with his eugenics ‘research’, and all of this was made possible by funds provided by … the Rockefellers.

Dr. Rudin was unanimously elected president of the International Federation of Eugenics Societies at the New York Congress, and this was, in part, a recognition of his work as a founder of the German Society for Race Hygiene.

The eugenics movement called for the sterilisation of mental patients (mental hygiene societies); the execution of criminals, the insane, and the terminally ill (euthanasia societies); and race purification by sterilization and the prevention of births to those considered inferior bloodstocks (population control societies). All of this was up and running long before anyone had heard of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. Hitler’s Germany was a vehicle for part of this movement; it wasn’t the whole movement.

Soon after Hitler had abolished elections and became dictator of Germany in 1933, the Rockefeller-funded Dr. Rudin was commissioned to write the “Law for the Prevention of Hereditary Diseases in Posterity”, which involved the forced sterilisation of anyone considered genetically inferior. A quarter of a million people who were mental patients, blind, deaf, or alcoholics were sterilised on the order of special eugenics courts….

But where did the Nazi Rudin get his inspiration from for the wording of his race laws?

From the Model Eugenical Sterilization Law of 1922, presented by H.H. Laughlin, the eugenics ‘expert’ of the US House of Representatives Committee on Immigration and Nationalisation, which was accepted by many States.

Eugenics was not unique to Nazi Germany. In 1942, the American ‘psychiatrist’ Foster Kennedy called for the killing of retarded children, and between 1941 and ‘43 more than 42,000 people were sterilised in America.

Nor did the master race mentality end in 1945 with the demise of Hitler’s Germany. Obviously, talk of master races, racial purity, and sterilisation to improve the stock was bad PR, once some of the tales of Nazi projects began to be known. But all that happened was that the names for master race policies were changed to disguise the true meaning.

We began to hear about euthanasia and population control instead of eugenics and race purification, but it’s all the same thing really. What the Harrimans, Rockefellers, and people like Prescott Bush were funding and supporting before and during the war, their successors have continued to promote under the cover of ‘acceptable’ language.

For instance, one of the people who worked with the Harrimans and Prescott Bush in their funding of Hitler was William H. Draper Jr., the man who helped to fund the Nazi cartels and was then appointed by Roosevelt after the war to decide what should be done with them.

Draper, a close associate of Averell Harriman, was a major funder of the International Eugenics Congress before the war and was one of those responsible for making Dr. Ernst Rudin, the head of the world eugenics movement. In 1958, Draper was appointed to chair a committee which was advising President Dwight Eisenhower on the use of military aid to other countries.

This appointment was made possible by Prescott Bush, who was then a US Senator for Connecticut. Bush was a regular golf partner of the president and of National Security Advisor Gordon Gray (a close friend and eugenics promoter).

By now, John Foster Dulles (Bush’s former lawyer during the funding of Hitler) was the Secretary of State, and his brother, Allen Dulles (formerly with Schroder, Hitler’s personal bankers) was head of the CIA.

To put it mildly, a eugenics enthusiast like Draper had many people around him of like mind. This allowed him to change the whole thrust of his committee from that of advising on military aid to campaigning on the threat of the ‘population explosion’. His committee formulated plans to depopulate the poorer countries: i.e. those people who do not have white skins. The growth of such peoples, said Draper, was a threat to the national security of the United States.

Eisenhower dismissed Draper’s proposals, but with support from his fellow racial purity fanatics, he went on to found the Population Crisis Committee/’Draper Fund, which— together with the Rockefeller and DuPont families— continued to promote eugenics under the guise of population control.

Draper was advisor to President Lyndon Johnson on this subject and that administration began to use the overseas aid programme to fund birth control in non-white countries.

Another of Draper’s like-minds in American politics was to be Prescott’s son, George Bush, a vocal supporter of General Draper’s policies. Bush arranged hearings as early as 1969 into the dangers posed by the birth of too many black babies.

Draper’s son and heir, William H. Draper III, was co-chairman for finance and head of fundraising for the George Bush For President campaign in 1980.

Later in that decade, Bush persuaded Ronald Reagan to appoint the younger Draper to be administrator of the United Nations Development Programme, an organisation connected with the World Bank and charged with supervising population control!

Eugenics and master race policies were passed on across the generations of these ruling families of the Elite. During George Bush’s tenure in the White House, the population control element of the aid budget soared. His legal counsel from 1980 was Boyden Gray, who became the chief legal advisor to the President during the Bush administration.

Gray would have been able to give him plenty of advice on population control. When Boyden was a boy after the war, his father, Gordon Gray (Prescott Bush’s close friend), launched the project which provided the basis of today’s global sterilisation programme.

In 1946, the eugenics movement was trying to rebuild itself in the wake of the rather unfortunate publicity aroused by on of its chief advocates, Adolf Hitler. During the war, The Sterilization League of America had changed its name to Birthright Inc., and was now looking for a means to get back to business.

Its efforts to relaunch itself in Iowa ended when a young boy died during a sterilisation operation and the bad publicity brought an end to the plan. Instead they moved to Gray family territory in North Carolina.

Gordon Gray had founded the Bownam Gray (Memorial) Medical School in Winston-Salem. It was named after Boyden’s grandfather, who had owned the R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company.

The school became a centre for eugenics. It compiled extensive records of families carrying ‘inherited diseases’, and it began a project which … get this … forcibly sterilised young children who were not considered to be of a high enough IQ.

No, no. I am not talking about Nazi Germany during the war; I am talking about the United States of America in 1946-1947!

Boyden Gray’s great aunt, Alice Shelton Gray, founded the Human Betterment League (the North Carolina branch of the national eugenics sterilisation movement), and she was the official supervisor of the master race experiment that was begun at the Grays’ ‘medical school’.

Others involved were Dr. Claude Nash Herndon, the assistant director of ‘medical genetics’ at the school, and Dr. Clarence Gamble (the heir to the Proctor and Gamble soap empire), who was the chief of ‘national field operations’.

Children enrolled in the Winston-Salem school district were given ‘intelligence tests’ and those who fell below the mark considered acceptable to these bizarre people were sterilised.

Their recommendations were passed to the State Eugenics Board, which had the authority to order sterilisation under North Carolina law. Dr. Claude Nash Herdon talked of his work in an interview in 1990 which was reported in George Bush, The Unauthorised Biography:

“…IQ tests were run on all the children in the Winston-Salem school system. Only the ones who scored really low [were targeted for sterilisation], the real bottom of the barrel, like below 70. Did we do sterilizations on young children? Yes. This was a relatively minor operation. … It was usually not [done] until the child was eight or ten years old. For the boys, you just make an incision and tie the tube. … We more often performed the operation on girls than with boys. Of course, you have to cut open the abdomen, but again, it is relatively minor.”

Oh, that’s OK then. What were the media doing while all this was going on? Not a lot, it turns out. Dr. Herndon talked of their “good relationship” with the press. This is less surprising when you realize that Gordon Gray owned the Winston-Salem Journal, the Twin City Sentinel and the radio station WSJS.

Eugenics was being promoted on a wide scale after the war in the guise of population control, just as it is today. In the early 50s, when John Foster Dulles was chairman of the tax-exempt New World Order front, the Rockefeller Foundation, he travelled with John D. Rockefeller III on a number of world tours campaigning for policies to stem the expansion of the non-white populations.

In November 1952, Dulles and Rockefeller launched the Population Council with tens of millions of dollars provided by the Rockefeller family. The American Eugenics Society left its old headquarters at Yale University, the home of the sinister Skull and Bones Society, and moved in with the Population Council. The two organisations, in effect, became one.

The first president of the Population Council was Frederick Osborne, the long-time secretary of the American Eugenics Society. The child-steriliser of North Carolina, Dr. Claude Nash Herndon, was made president of the Eugenics Society in 1953.

When George Bush became ambassador to the United Nations in 1972, he and his clique in the US Agency for International Development arranged the first official contract between the American government and the Sterilization League of America, which had, by then, changed its name yet again, to the Association for Voluntary Surgical Contraception.

Under this contract, the US government (taxpayers) began to fund this organisation to do in non-white countries of the world what it had already done to children in North Carolina.

In 1988, the year George Bush was elected president, another contract was arranged which involved the American taxpayer spending $80 million over five years to expand this work in 58 countries in Asia, Africa, and Spanish-America. Millions have been sterilised and most of it has been funded by the taxpayer.

Other countries do the same. And by the way, Dr. Clarence Gamble, the sterilising enthusiast from the Proctor and Gamble soap family and the Bowman Gray Medical School, as also enjoyed funding from the USAID budget.

His so-called Pathfinder Fund is paid to infiltrate non-white societies and break down resistance to sterilisation.

The Planned Parenthood Federation, which has been supported at every opportunity by George Bush and the manipulating Elite, was actually founded in London, at the offices of the British Eugenics Society….

Global centralisation of power, fundamental control of the minds and bodies of the mass population, and the creation of a master race.

These are the themes that span the centuries and they still dominate the secret agenda today, which is manipulating our lives….



Nov 6, 200l

Activist says he has proof
U.S. created HIV

by Eric Ture Muhammad

WASHINGTON – For the past nine years Boyd Ed Graves has lived with HIV. Since the beginning of his research in 1992, he has become one of the world’s most recognized AIDS activists.

For the last two years, Mr. Graves has charged the U.S. government with the creation of this disease as a part of an overall plan to eliminate world populations, Blacks in particular.

He also asserts that the plan and its execution has cost U.S. taxpayers $550 million and that he has discovered evidence of an AIDS-virus flow chart produced by the government that he says proves his claim.

Until recently, these assertions beyond the scientific community have been at best alarming. Many critics sought to disprove them. However, the recently piqued interest of an Ohio congressman has breathed new life in the activist’s war on the disease.

Rep. James A. Traficant Jr. (D-Ohio) has expressed interest in Mr. Graves’ claims and is in the process of organizing a hearing on the Special Virus Cancer Program of the U.S. government that ran from 1962-1978. According to published reports, he has also asked the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) to provide an account of American tax dollars allegedly provided for the project.

Rep.Traficant, no stranger to theories of government conspiracy, was the lead congressional investigator into the ill-fated TWA flight 800 that, in 1996, crashed shortly after takeoff from Kennedy International Airport into the Atlantic Ocean.

“What we expect initially from Congressman Traficant is to have him on the floor of the House to unveil the flow chart,” said Dr. Graves, who also is director of AIDS Concerns for the International Medical Research Foundation of the group Common Cause in Ontario, Canada.

If you follow the money, we can get to the heart of this issue. The GAO sent a letter on Aug. 20, that indeed they had looked into the preliminary information that they had received from the congressman, the flowchart and the budget for this program and were calling for an additional investigation from the Health Care Team of the GAO,” he said.

“The congressman has agreed to ask for an investigation by the GAO or the Congressional Committee on Investigations,” said Anthony Traficanti, the congressman’s regional director.

“The information presented by Dr. Graves is very shocking and very revealing. Our government is supposed to be sensitive to the people’s concerns and the flowchart was very revealing to me,” he said in a recent interview with The Buckeye Review.

The 1971 U.S. Special AIDS Virus Flow Chart was unveiled in October 1999 by Dr. Graves at the Western Reserve Historical Society in Cleveland, Ohio. It coordinates over 20,000 scientific papers and 15 years of progress reports of a secret, federal virus development program.

It contains within its five-section foldout, thousands of secret experiments detailing the creation and mass production of a human immunodefeciency virus. Independent experts agree that this program is the birthplace of HIV/AIDS and other mysterious illnesses, according to Mr. Graves.

In 1977, this virus program produced 15,000 gallons of AIDS, he said. According to the chart, the United States was represented by Dr. Robert Gallo and the USSR (Soviet Union) was represented by a Dr. Novakhatskiy of the Ivanosky Institute.

“This was the beginnings of the plot to thin the Black population,” Mr. Graves said.

“The flow chart is the research logic flow of an ultra-secret federal program called ‘The Special Virus’.”

It is the designer product of a century long hunt for a contagious cancer that will selectively kill.

The necessity for the creation and deployment of AIDS is fully outlined in U.S. population control policy decisions including National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM-200) of 1974, written and presented by Henry Kissinger at the mega-conference on population control held in Bucharest, Romania,” Dr. Graves told The Final Call.

In January 2000, Mr. Graves filed a lawsuit against the president of the United States charging the government created the HIV virus.

In January 2001, that case was dismissed in federal court as “frivolous.”

Last April, Dr. Graves, armed with 10,000 signatures, hand delivered to the Supreme Court an appeals brief on the matter. It is currently under review.

Comparing the discovery as a trip through the “Land of Oz,” Dr. Graves said the chart provides irrefutable evidence that HIV/AIDS is a design of population control and it dispels the myths associated with the disease.

“I don’t know where you were when you saw for the first time the curtain pulled back in the film The Wizard of Oz, and discovered that things weren’t what they seemed. That discovery changes a person. How dare the U.S. government perpetrate that over 70 percent of the deaths from HIV/AIDS are found in the Black communities because we are more sexually scurrilous.

That is simply not true.

“The majority of the U.S. population is white. How then can Black women be the fastest growing group coming down with HIV/AIDS today when the largest sexual preferences (gay, bisexual and multi-partnered) are found among American whites?

“How does a so-called white, homosexual disease, transform itself into a health problem for Black women?” he asked.

The flow chart can be accessed through his website

For more, GO TO > > > The Global Fund


October 28, 2000


The Associated Press

MOSCOW – The boy thought his grandmother was taking him to Disneyland, but Russian police say she had other plans: to sell her grandson so his organs could be used for transplants.

Police in Ryazan, 125 miles southeast of Moscow, said Saturday that they arrested a woman after they were tipped that she was trying to sell her grandson to a man who was going to take the boy to the West.

There his organs were to be removed and sold, a Ryazan police duty officer said….

The woman was helped in the scheme by the boy’s uncle, who told police the child was being sold for about $70,000.

When asked how he could sell his nephew, the uncle replied: “My mother said that it is none of my business, he is her grandson.”

The boy, whose age was not released, lived with his grandmother. Police said she told him he was being taken to Disneyland.

Body parts have been smuggled out of Russia in the past for sale in the West as organ replacements.


September 30, 2000


LONDON, England (CNN) – Police in the Canadian province of Nova Scotia have issued an arrest warrant for a British pathologist after children’s organs were discovered in a warehouse.

Police in the town of Halifax say the organs appear to be from one or two children and DNA tests are now being conducted to try to identify the remains.

The warrant for the arrest of Dr. Dick van Velzen has been issued across Canada for “improperly or indecently interfering or offering indignity to a dead human body or human remains,” police said.

The doctor has been linked to previous cases of the removal of organs and tissue from dead children at the Alder Hey hospital in Liverpool, England.

An inquiry is being held in Britain into more than 800 cases of organ removals, for which parents said they were not advised of, at the hospital.

Police in Halifax said they did not believe the organs were from local children and had been stored at the warehouse for at least two years….

~ ~ ~





China – From Midweek, 11/8/00: China’s Brutal One-Child Policy. . . .


By Michelle Malkin

Is there a protester out there brave enough to wear that phrase on a T-shirt? Search high and low, but you will not find any … activists criticizing communist China’s peddlers of RU-486, the abortion pill.

The Washington Post reported recently that the Hua Lian Pharmaceutical Co, a govt-owned firm outside of Shanghai, will manufacture Mifepristone— the raw compound for RU-486— for sale in the United States. The firm is one of three in China that makes the drug. It won U.S. approval to produce and export abortion drug ingredients here thanks to financial help from population control fanatics at the Rockefeller Foundation.

Pro-abortion groups are ecstatic. But while American women celebrate their newly-acquired “choice,” millions of pregnant women in China are forced to swallow the poison pill against their will. It is no small coincidence that RU-486 was originally developed by a drug company whose parent corporation manufactured Zyklon Bthe poison gas used in Nazi concentration camps to destroy millions of unwanted lives.

Family-planning propagandists in China slyly echo the liberating rhetoric of their U.S. counterparts.

RU-486 has given women more choices, and it’s been beneficial to women’s health,” Gao Ersheng, director of the Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research, told the Post. “Most unmarried women prefer Mifepristone, which is less painful and more private than surgical abortions,” Gao told The New York Times.

Preferences? Pain? Privacy?

Since when did Chinese family-planning bureaucrats care about any of those things? Certainly not since they instituted the one-child policy in 1979. An army of 200,000 officials and a million volunteers who comprise “street committees” snoop on the fertility of Chinese citizens. The government keeps dossiers tracking women’s menstrual cycles.

All women who “choose” to undergo surgical abortions “prefer” to do so without anesthesia.

Out of an estimated 10 million abortions performed in China each year, the Washington Post reports, about half of those that are performed in the cities use RU-486. The other five million women undergo such methods as saline injections to induce miscarriage; Ribalor injections, which cause congestive heart failure in the unborn baby, who is then delivered dead; or partial-birth abortions in which doctors inject formaldehyde into a baby’s soft spot as the child crowns during delivery.

“Neither abortion nor RU-486 is a subject for moral debate in China in the way it is in the United States,” the Post noted. There is no debate in China about anything. When a family disagrees with the government’s diagnosis, the consequences are hellish— ranging from back-breaking fines and forced sterilization to mass infanticide. . . .

If you think government-sponsored baby-killing no longer happens in 21st century China, you missed last month’s international headlines: “Chinese officials drown baby in front of parents.” Huang Quisheng, a rural farmer, told London reporters how family planners had tried to induce a miscarriage in his eight-months-pregnant wife by injecting saline solution into her womb.

Against the odds, their baby son survived and was born healthy.

But, as Huang recounted: “They grabbed him from me and threw him to the floor and kicked him several times. We were ordered to go home as they took him to the back of the government building and drowned him…”

The enforcers of this brutal regime will now reap profits by selling their deadly abortion pills to the United States. Feminists embrace them; the White House toasts them; a bipartisan Congress rewards them with a multibillion-dollar trade deal.

The laboratories of an evil empire churn and bellow as millions of Chinese parents mourn.

And where are America’s human rights activists?

Boycotting Happy Meals, sneakers and Kathie Lee….


Planned Parenthood Federation of America“One of America’s greatest threats to the right to life”.

The Real Planned Parenthood Agenda

“Only an utterly ruthless, steely-nerved manipulator such as Sanger could have parlayed a daring, New-Age style immorality into a massive, multi-billion dollar enterprise so immensely powerful that in many countries (the U.S. included) it is…like a government within a government.”

 – Bernard Nathanson, MD, Pro-life former abortionist

~ ~ ~

They’re big. They’re strong. They’re powerful. They have an influential presence in every state. They’re widely respected and revered.

And they’re one of America’s greatest threats to the right to life.

The Planned Parenthood Federation of America, which operates on a current massive annual budget of more than $504 million (an increase of $27 million from the previous year) and has local affiliates all across Pennsylvania and state affiliates nationwide, has a record for ending the lives of unborn children that is unmatched by any other institution in the free world.

Founded by Margaret Sanger, who wrote in her book Women and the New Race, “The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it,” Planned Parenthood continues to annually increase its involvement in doing abortions.

While the national abortion rate decreases, PPFA’s piece of the pie grows ever larger. Planned Parenthood did 133,289 abortions at its centers in 1994, and 139,899 in 1995, and 153,367 in 1996.

Planned Parenthood referred women elsewhere for an additional 98,325 abortions in 1994 and 59,682 in 1995.

In 1996, they referred women who didn’t want to parent their babies for adoption only 6,274 times, giving them a 22-to-1 ratio in favor of abortion over adoption for women who went to them for “help.”

This emphasis on abortion as the solution to problem pregnancies is also shown in a report from the General Accounting Office which showed that pregnant women who go to Planned Parenthood for counseling abort seven times more often than women who go to other “family planning” agencies.

What’s worse, annually as much as $171.9 million of Planned Parenthood’s funding comes from your taxes in the form of government contracts and grants.

Their other funding comes from income from the clinics ($180.5 million annually), private and corporate contributions ($122.7 million annually) and other sources.

In addition to activities directly related to doing and promoting abortions, Planned Parenthood acts as one of the most powerful lobbying organizations in favor of abortion on demand. PPFA’s annual report from 1993-94 reported on eight pending lawsuits against state regulations of abortion, including four cases in which PPFA was petitioning the courts to be given public funds that democratically elected state legislatures had refused to administer to them.

In Pennsylvania, Planned Parenthood seemed to have a real problem with parents, as they sued the state, holding up legislation allowing parental involvement in minors’ abortion decisions for five years in the courts, at great cost to taxpayers….

(Source – PA Pro-Life Federation) Contact us at:

* * *

Get the Facts on Planned Parenthood

by Brian Clowes, PhD

Human Life International has long been at the forefront of the battle against the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA), by exposing its true anti-life agenda throughout the world.

Most of our readers know that PPFA is a pro-abortion group and that it commits surgical abortions on a large scale. But not all yet realize the insidious nature of PPFA and its horrific impact on society as the behemoth of the abortion industry.

In the United States, about 20,000 staff and volunteers operate 142 Planned Parenthood affiliates and their 900 clinics, 130 of which commit surgical abortions.

 In 1996, PPFA recorded an income of over half a billion dollars, one-third of which was taken out of taxpayers’ pockets.

In the same year, the organization committed 153,367 surgical abortions and referred 54,207 more; administered nearly a million pregnancy tests; had nearly two million birth control customers; filed suit against dozens of pro-life laws; and pushed explicit sex education programs all over the country….

These numbers give some idea of the colossal impact that Planned Parenthood has on millions of people every year, and tragically our youth….

PPFAs Involvement in Surgical and Chemical Abortion

In 1984, Faye Wattleton, then-President of PPFA, said “We know that the abortion issue is our issue.” Abortion has always been Planned Parenthood’s number one issue.

On 1 July 1970, the state of New York legalized abortion. PPFA was so eager to begin exterminating preborn lives that it committed its first abortion the very next day. It now owns the biggest chain of abortion factories in the country and has committed nearly two and a half million abortions in the last 28 years——a number equivalent to the populations of St. Louis, San Diego, Phoenix, Pittsburgh or Baltimore.

Ever anxious to exploit new ways of exterminating the preborn, PPFA now pushes so-called “post-coital contraception” in a big way. The group recommends “doubling up” on birth control pills in order to enhance their abortifacient effect to end the life of an early developing human being. In 1996, PPFA gave this abortifacient to nearly 30,000 women, and will administer it to 50,000 more this year.

It is also beginning to administer methotrexate/misoprostol (“MTX”) chemical abortions, and has declared its intention to distribute the RU-486 abortion pill on a massive scale as soon as it becomes available.

To show how lopsidedly it emphasizes only one choice——abortion——PPFA commits or refers ten surgical abortions for each referral for prenatal care or adoption.

PPFA’s Aggressive Pro-Abortion Litigation

Planned Parenthood has demonstrated its absolute commitment to abortion by acting as a plaintiff in hundreds of lawsuits against pro-life laws in almost every state, even when such laws are supported by the vast majority of the people and the state legislatures.

A Planned Parenthood executive was the plaintiff in the 1965 Supreme Court case that discovered the mythical “right to privacy”——Griswold v. Connecticut. Today, PPFA fights any limits on abortion, regardless of how trivial they are. It has opposed informed consent laws, waiting periods for minors, parental or spousal consent or notification, decent burial or cremation for aborted preborn babies, and even attempts to set standards for the licensing of abortion mills, which would safeguard the health of women.

Planned Parenthood has even challenged bans on third-trimester D&X abortions in several states. It also puts the lie to its claim to be a “pro-choice” group, since the only ‘‘choice’’ it supports is abortion. It has attempted to force the Roman Catholic Church to provide abortions to children in its care and has even gone to court to force high school student newspapers to accept its advertisements.

Tax Dollars

In 1970, Planned Parenthood first began receiving government money when its clinic in Corpus Christi, Texas, received $7,000 in government support. Since then, PPFA has swallowed more than $3.9 billion (in 1998 dollars) of our federal, state and local tax dollars in the relentless pursuit of its comprehensive anti-life agenda. In 1996 alone, PPFA received $177.5 million from federal, state and local governments.

Since 1970, Federal Title X grants have been the largest single source of PPFA’s income from outside sources, and it now receives over $40 million annually from this program.

In light of the fact that PPFA annually rakes in tens of millions of dollars by selling abortions and makes tens of millions more by selling birth control devices at a huge markup, we must ask why American taxpayers—especially those who are pro-life—should continue to subsidize an organization that obviously can very easily support itself.

This vast Title X government subsidy allows PPFA to pay its operatives staggering salaries. For example, in 1995, PPFA’s then-President, Pamela Maraldo, received a $251,538 salary, and at least four PPFA vice presidents and other officers received salaries ranging between $151,000 and $189,000.

Sex Education

Faye Wattleton said of PPFA: “We are not going to be an organization promoting celibacy or chastity.”

Soon after the 1973 Roe v. Wade abortion decision, Planned Parenthood’s Alan Guttmacher revealed one of the primary purposes of value-free sex education when he admitted that “The only avenue the International Planned Parenthood Federation and its allies could travel to win the battle for abortion on demand is through sex education.”

This makes perfect marketing sense, and positions Planned Parenthood to perpetuate itself forever. First, it distributes grossly offensive sex education manuals throughout the United States. Teens who might otherwise be chaste learn from these books that it is “perfectly normal” to have sex, and so they visit the local Planned Parenthood clinic and pick up contraceptives. When the contraceptives fail (as they frequently do, especially among teens), then they return to the Planned Parenthood clinic for an abortion or a referral for an abortion elsewhere.

This is a self-maintaining system that any marketer would be envious of: Make money by creating the demand for your products and services, and then reap further profits from selling them.

All of PPFA’s sex education manuals tell our children that they can embrace the complete line of anti-life behavior and be guilt-free: fornication, masturbation, contraception, abortion, pornography and homosexual acts. These manuals also repeat the old Kinsey line that “humans are sexual beings from before birth until death.” For example, Planned Parenthood’s sex-ed text The New Positive Images talks about “erections of penis” and “possibility of orgasm” — to three-year-old children.

In addition to promoting immorality, Planned Parenthood has vigorously attacked sex education programs that teach any standard of morality. PPFA has filed lawsuits whose purpose is to ban effective abstinence-based sex education programs from high schools, on the grounds that they “violate the separation of church and state” by teaching a “religious point of view” ——i.e., chastity and self-control.

This proves that PPFA believes such effective programs are threats to its income and influence. After all, Planned Parenthood doesn’t make any money from kids practicing chastity.

The objections that most pro-life organizations raise against Planned Parenthood are not only religious in nature, but profoundly practical as well. The natural and inevitable consequences of the permissive agenda pushed by PPFA and other anti-life groups are devastating from a public health standpoint. Abortion, teen fornication, illegitimate births, child abuse and child poverty, “shacking up,” venereal diseases, and divorce have increased tremendously since 1970.

These in turn have led to other baleful results, from millions more women and children living in poverty to a general relaxing of moral standards and society’s willingness to accept other atrocities such as physician-assisted suicide, cloning and frozen human embryos.

Planned Parenthood’s lavish funding also allows it to attack those who try to slow the deterioration of the health and morals of our society. PPFA has attacked pro-lifers and pro-life laws in the courts at all levels, thereby stripping any legal protection from pre-born babies and their defenders.

Every local pro-life group and individual that joins the battle against this anti-life monster weakens it and ultimately makes it easier for all pro-lifers to do their jobs….

Learn more about Planned Parenthood.

Visit HLI’s Web site at

* * *

Cut Planned Parenthood Loose
from our Tax Dollars

© 1998 by David W. Neuendorf

Just three years ago, most of the world celebrated the fiftieth anniversary of the defeat of Hitler’s Third Reich, perpetrators of the Holocaust in Europe. This month marks the twenty-fifth year of the continuing political battle over our American Holocaust: the legalized murder by abortion of over 35 million unborn children.

The legalization of abortion in America was perpetrated by the Supreme Court in its infamous decision in Roe vs. Wade. The organization most responsible for the cultural and political changes leading to the court’s decision is the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. That organization is considered respectable by enough Americans that they have been able to obtain significant (about one third of their budget) funding through tax dollars.

Just how respectable is Planned Parenthood? Their status as one of the largest abortion “providers” ought to say it all, but that isn’t enough to convince most Americans of the organization’s depravity. Perhaps a brief glimpse at their history will open some eyes.

Planned Parenthood began life in 1921 as the American Birth Control League, the brainchild of extreme leftist Margaret Sanger. It evolved through mergers and name changes into what we know today as the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Sanger’s lifelong ambition was to reduce the world’s population, particularly that of the poor and “unfit,” through birth control. She also promoted contraception as the means to free women from the natural consequences of the promiscuous lifestyle that she openly practiced and recommended for everyone.

The views of Sanger’s movement can be found throughout their publications. The Birth Control Review was replete with articles advocating everything from freely available contraception to involuntary sterilization for “dysgenic groups in our population.” The April 1933 issue of that publication was dedicated to the “science” of eugenics, or selective breeding of human beings. It featured an article by Ernst Rudin, an official of Hitler’s NAZI regime….

Planned Parenthood will claim that some of Sanger’s statements reflect opinions that they no longer support. Certainly that is true in the case of abortion. Sanger publicly disapproved of it; Planned Parenthood has established it as a major industry.

As for the idea that women should have control over their own bodies, and birth control should always be voluntary, consider this statement from former Planned Parenthood leader Alan Guttmacher:

“Each country will have to decide its own form of coercion, determining when and how it should be employed…The means presently available are compulsory sterilization and compulsory abortion.

I wish we had the space to elaborate much more on the history of this unholy organization. If you have access to the Internet, you can find an amazing amount of material on both sides of the issue.

For the case against Sanger and Planned Parenthood, start at Human Life International’s web site at and follow their various links.

Also check out Eugenics Watch at for some related material.

 For the pro-Sanger view, try Planned Parenthood itself at, and the Sanger Papers Project at

I don’t want my tax dollars to pay for any of the activities of an organization like Planned Parenthood; nor do millions of other Americans.

Is it asking too much to require our opponents to raise their own funds for their nefarious programs?

A fitting memorial to twenty five years of government sanctioned infanticide under Roe vs. Wade would be for Congress to remove all federal funding from Planned Parenthood.

To go to Dave Neuendorf’s Home Page

* * *


by Mike Perry

“We are merely walking down the path that
Mrs. Sanger carved for us.”

–Dr. Alan Guttmacher, President of Planned Parenthood, 1962-74.

Planned Parenthood is powerful

It has the enthusiastic support of influential organizations and extensive connections inside the government. It invariably gets favorable coverage in the news media and each year it receives large sums of money from taxes and community charities. Yet the public knows nothing about its history. This silence has a reason.

Rooted in Fear

In the years after World War I, a number of competing organizations formed to promote birth control. The most controversial of these was the American Birth Control League (ABCL). In 1933, Eleanor Dwight Jones, the President of ABCL, described the organization’s founders as “a devoted group of liberals and feminists led by Margaret Sanger.”

These organizations arose out of the fears of America’s affluent, educated elite. To have more money and time for themselves, they were having fewer children. As a result they were alarmed by the high birth rates of poor and working-class people. They considered the prolific poor, as Sanger put it, “the most far reaching peril to the future of civilization.”

Two Movements

Two movements developed in response to these fears. Both considered the nation a “race” that could be strengthened by keeping the birth rate of the “fit” (the affluent) above that of the “unfit” (the poor). They differed only in whose birth rate they wanted to change.

The eugenicists warned of “race suicide” if the nation’s dominant group, educated people of Northern European descent, did not increase its birthrate. President Theodore Roosevelt expressed their view in March 1905 when he attacked women who used birth control as “criminal against the race.” This group wanted more children from the “fit.”

The other movement, birth controllers, was more attractive to feminists such as Margaret Sanger. It did not demand that affluent women abandon careers for large families. It planned to achieve race building by forcing down the birth rate of the “unfit.”…

In her autobiography, Margaret Sanger summarized the differences between the two movements: Eugenics without birth control seemed to me a house built upon sands…The eugenicists wanted to shift the birth-control emphasis from less children for the poor to more children for the rich. We went back of that and sought to stop the multiplication of the unfit.”

To stop this “multiplication,” Sanger could be harsh. Her book The Pivot of Civilization has a chapter called “The Cruelty of Charity.” In it she blasts as “insidiously injurious” programs to provide “medical and nursing facilities to slum mothers.” Such programs “facilitate the function of maternity” when “the absolute necessity is to discourage it.”

Sanger believed that a poor woman who died in childbirth gave other poor women more incentive to visit her conveniently located birth control clinics….

Shifting Targets Revealingly

The public relations consultant who recommended the name change was not the first to suggest “Planned Parenthood” as a name. The suggestion came in a 1938 letter from Dr. Lydia DeVilbiss, a Florida physician, birth controller and racist. Choosing a name suggested by an open racist illustrates once again that the new name didn’t mean a new agenda.

Dr. DeVilbiss’ influence also reflects a new priority. Racial minorities were now more threatening than immigrants. The reason is obvious. The same elitist fears that created the birth control movement also led to the restrictive 1924 immigration laws. (Blocked from immigrating by elitist American anti-semitism, millions of Jews would die under the Nazis.)

In its place came a new migration. The nation’s black population was on the move. At the turn of the century 90 percent of the nation’s blacks lived in the South. But racism, depression, and war industry brought them north, where they replaced immigrant Catholics and Jews in the ghettos. By the 1960s half the nation’s blacks would live outside the South.

Similar conditions brought Hispanics to this country. Reaching these people with birth control required new tactics. As the 1940 symposium title hints, “race building” in a democracy has to be subtle. Coercion cannot be overt. Deception must take the place of force. The victims must never know they are a target.

A number of tactics were used to deceive the victims.

Visible Blacks

First, birth controllers hoped (correctly) that black leaders would be easier to manipulate than Catholic leaders had been. The movement planned to win black cooperation by placing blacks in highly visible positions.

Sanger described this to Clarence Gamble in October 1939. In that letter she described how “colored Ministers, preferably with social service backgrounds” could be used and added ominously, “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out the idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

Clarence Gamble advocated the same tactic in a private memo that year when he said, “There is a great danger that we will fail because the Negroes think it a plan for extermination. Hence lets appear to let the colored think it run it as we appear to let south do the conference at Atlanta.”

Under this policy PPFA hired a full-time “Negro Consultant” in 1944….

The Stage Is Set

The stage was set for a new strategy. Support from the wealthy and powerful was assured. As in the days of Moses and the Pharaoh, such people were eager to curtail the birth rates of the poor and socially troublesome.

The cooperation of the news media could be counted on. Given the large minority populations of most big cities, journalists who never exposed the ugly anti-immigrant bigotry of the earlier “race building” birth controllers could be relied on to keep silent about Planned Parenthood’s new agenda and particularly its impact on black and Hispanic families….

The Play Begins

The play began in earnest during the 1960s and was motivated by several factors.

First, the civil rights movement eliminated the worst aspects of Southern racism. The Northern liberal elite supported civil rights, in part, to reduce the pressures driving blacks northward. (As a number of blacks have noted, liberals never displayed much enthusiasm for combating Northern racism.) This paralleled the post-World War I tactic of restricting immigration and then forcing down birth rates. In a 1926 speech at Vassar, Sanger spoke of that very tactic when she said that the nation needed to follow the “drastic immigration laws” of 1924 with methods “to cut down on the rapid multiplication of the unfit and undesirable at home.”

Second, during the fifties Planned Parenthood had purred contentedly at the high birth rate of white suburbia. Its eugenic (“more from the fit”) side was in control. But after the advent of the birth control pill in 1960, middle-class birth rates plummeted. As a result, the birth rates of racial (black and Hispanic) and religious (conservative Catholic and Protestant) minorities became disproportionately high.

The “less from the unfit” side of Planned Parenthood again became dominant. In the latter half of the 1960s, Planned Parenthood and similar groups spent millions of dollars promoting the idea that the U.S. was in the midst of a dangerous population explosion.

The idea was so absurd it could be disproved in five minutes at any public library. Caught up in the hysteria, however, the nation’s news media never questioned why groups were warning of a “population bomb” in the midst of plummeting birth rates….

All the public warnings of a “population explosion” hid the real agenda, reducing the birth rates of socially troublesome groups.

The problem was compounded by a third factor, the “sexual revolution” of the late 1960s. High rates of promiscuity meant still more troublesome births in both the white and black communities….

A highly powerful and highly privileged group, abortion supporters fear any social change that might alter their advantaged circumstances. In their efforts to maintain the demographic status quo in spite of their low birth rate, Planned Parenthood is one of their most useful weapons. Christianity, on the other hand, is one of their most potent enemies….

(The original research for this article began during graduate work in Biomedical History at the University of Washington’s medical school.)

~ ~ ~

About The Author: Mike Perry is a free-lance writer and historian. He is currently writing a book describing the Nazi indoctrination of German youth; it is tentatively entitled From the Tenderest Years.


The Population Council – On Sept 28, 2000, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the “abortion pill” RU-486 for use in the United States.

This represents the first time in our nation’s history that our government has ever approved a drug for the specific purpose of taking the life of another human being.

~ ~ ~

From Population Council web site:

Our Mission . . . to improve the well-being and reproductive health of current and future generations and to help achieve a humane, equitable, and sustainable balance people and resources.

What is the Population Council?

We are an international, nonprofit institution that conducts research on three fronts: biomedical, social science, and public health. This research— and the information it produces— helps change the way people think about problems related to reproductive health and population growth….

Who started the Council, and why?

The Council was established in 1952 by John D. Rockefeller 3rd, to search for a better understanding of problems relating to population. A humanitarian, Mr. Rockefeller was deeply affected by trips to densely populated regions of South and East Asia in 1950, where millions of people were living at subsistence level and the population was growing rapidly.

What is the Council’s budget?

Our 1999 expenditures were US $66.7 million . . . The budget for 2000 is US $76 million.

$ $ $

And where did the $66.7 million expenditures in 1999 come from? According to the Council, 3% came from Multilateral Organizations; 6% came from Foreign Governments; 12% came from Internal Funds; 20% came from (unnamed) Nongovernmental Organizations and Individuals; and


~ ~ ~

And how were our tax dollars spent?

According to the Population Council’s 1999 Annual Financial Report, $37,188,000 went to “International Programs”; $13,033,000 went to the Center for Biomedical Research; $4,753,000 went to “Policy Research Division”; $359,000 went to “Distinguished Colleagues”; $1,289,000 went to Publications; $9,581,000 went to Management & General Services; and $515,000 went to Fundraising.

~ ~ ~

And before actually spending our tax dollars,
where did they repose?

Well, the website doesn’t say, but I suspect that a good number of them were having fun in the sun in the Cayman Islands or some other off-shore tax-haven, or residing in the Bank of New York, Citibank or other insider-favored institution.

What this non-profit, tax exempt entity does tell us, however, is that in 1999 they had total assets of $176,280,000. Of this total, $110,049,000 was in Cash and Investments.

They also tell us that investment managers received 1% (or around $1,104,900 according to my fourth-grade fuzzy math) for the privilege of taking care of all this (former) taxpayer money.

And, for this handsome sum you would think that these wise old financial owls would earn an equally handsome return on investments in the raging bull market of 1999, wouldn’t you? Well, according to my fuzzy Economy 101 reading of the financial statements, these experts had a Net Unrealized Loss in Fair Value of Investments of $9,077,000 for the year.

~ ~ ~

Al Gore, speaking at the 1st Presidential Debate, and promising that he’ll defend the woman’s right to choose, points out: “… and in the audience is my good friend, Robert Rubin …”

~ ~ ~

Some of the Population Council’s 1999 Board of Trustees:

Elizabeth J. McCormack, Chairman of the Board, Associate, Rockefeller Family and Associates

Linda G. Martin, President, Population Council, NY, NY

Jorge Balan, Program Officer, The Ford Foundation, NY, NY

Abdullahi An-Na’im, Professor of Law, Emory University, Atlanta, GA

Alaka Basu, Senior Research Associate, Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY

Demissle Habte, Lead Health Specialist, Africa Technical Families, The World Bank, Wash., DC

Werner Holzer, Bad Homburg, Germany

Charles Klein, Managing Dir., American Securities, NY, NY

Robert B. Millard, Managing Dir., Lehman Brothers, Inc., NY, NY

Nancy Birdsall, Sr Assoc, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, DC

Rodney B. Wagner, Vice Chairman (Retired), J.P. Morgan, NY, NY

Torsten Wiesel, President Emeritus, Rockefeller University, NY, NY

 * * *

From The National Right to Life Committee website:

Mifepristone – The French Abortion Pill

RU486 is a chemical compound that, taken in pill form, can induce abortion in women up to 9 weeks pregnant.

This compound gets the first part of its name from the French company, Roussel Uclaf, which first developed the abortion pill back in 1980. . . . RU486 is also known by its generic name, mifepristone, and by Mifegyne, the name under which RU486 is marketed in Europe.

Early Option” is the name under which it is to be sold in the United States. . . .

Bringing RU486 to the U.S.

Under the Bush administration, the FDA issued an import alert, prohibiting the import of the drug for personal use because of safety concerns it had about the drug.

Three days after being sworn into office, President Bill Clinton signed an executive order directing the Department of Health and Human Services and the FDA to take steps to promote the testing, licensing, and manufacturing of the drug in the U.S.

~ ~ ~

Under the Clinton administration, the FDA took a very active role in efforts to bring the drug into the U.S. In the course of carrying out the president’s directive, the FDA:

        Actively pressured French manufacturer Roussel Uclaf to submit a marketing application.

        Helped negotiate the transfer of manufacturing and marketing rights from Roussel Uclaf to the Population Council of New York once it became clear Roussel Uclaf would not submit an application of its own.

        Allowed the Population Council to use data from foreign studies in its marketing application, rather than require the Council to wait until it was ready to submit data from American studies.

        Allowed the Population Council to submit its marketing application despite not having a finalized deal with any manufacturer or any finished chemical product from its would-be manufacturer. The FDA allowed the Population Council to use chemical and manufacturing data from Roussel Uclaf as the basis of the Council’s application, knowing that Roussel Uclaf would not be the manufacturer.

        Submitted the application to an advisory panel stacked with known abortion activists and RU486 supporters.

        Processed the application for RU486 in just six months, while potentially life saving drugs were taking as long as 17 months to be processed.

Is that the way the drug approval process is supposed to work?

Hardly. The FDA is supposed to be an objective agency representing the health and safety interests of the American people, not an agent for some manufacturer or some group with an ideological or political agenda.

With all that help from the Clinton administration, what kept the drug from being approved right away?

Perhaps even the FDA could only bend the rules so far. Having questions about the training program and lacking any drug sample or file from the firm that was to be the manufacturer, the best the FDA could do by the time its deadline came to rule on the drug application was to issue an “approvable” letter … but saying final approval would await the resolution of certain unnamed “labeling” and “manufacturing” issues.

Soon after the FDA issued its “approvable” letter in Sept of 1996, the Population Council and Joseph Pike, the man chosen by the Council to set up U.S. production of RU486 and handle financing of the project, became embroiled in controversy when would-be investors discovered in October 1996 that Mr. Pike was a disbarred lawyer with a criminal record.

These investors were also concerned about the unusual corporate structure Pike established and the integrity of his financial dealings and operations.

A series of suits and countersuits between the Population Council, Mr. Pike, and the would-be investors ensured, tying the drug’s sponsor up in court for several months…

Just as those suits began to be resolved in the spring of 1997, removing Pike from day to day management of the project, the Population Council received word that the Hungarian manufacturer, Gedeon Richter, that they had lined up to produce the drug for the U.S., was pulling out of the deal. Gedeon Richter gave no public reason for its withdrawal, but their pull out forced the Population Council to have to begin their search for a manufacturer all over again, setting back the project several years….

Why has the Population Council had such difficulty finding or keeping a manufacturer?

Early on, a spokesman for the Population Council indicated that several of the major drug companies they had originally talked to didn’t want to face the internal dissension that producing such a pill would bring. This is not surprising. Who, having devoted their life to the production of life-saving medicines, wants suddenly to be associated with a drug that kills little children? . . .


The blanket of secrecy with which the Population Council has tried to cover all of its activities, as well as all the mergers and acquisitions going on in the world pharmaceutical market, make it difficult to determine precisely who is doing what….

Roussel Uclaf is the French pharmaceutical company which first developed RU486 in the early 1980s. They were owned, first partly, then later, wholly, by German chemical giant Hoechst AG. Together, Roussel and Hoechst owned several American subsidiaries — Hoechst Roussel Parmaceuticals, Copley Pharmaceutical, and Hoechst Roussel Agri-Vet.

Under pressure from the U.S. government, Hoechst and Roussel donated the American patent for RU486 to the Population Council of New York in 1994. Roussel retained all remaining rights (those outside the US) to RU486 and continued to manufacture the drug for European use until at least 1997.

In 1995, Hoechst purchased American drug manufacturer Marion Merrell Dow (MMD), forming a new pharmaceutical company Hoechst Marion Roussel (HMR), then supposed to be the world’s third largest pharmaceutical maker.

As part of the acquisition, HMR acquired several of Marion Merret Dow’s best selling drugs such as Cardizem and Seldane, as well as rights to a new non-sedating antihistamine being developed by MMD called Allegra.

HMR also got MMD’s manufacturer of generic drugs, The Rugby Group.

HMR sold off The Rugby Group in 1998 and Copley Pharmaceuticals in 1999.

In 1999, Hoechst and HMR merged with another European pharmaceutical giant, Rhone Poulenc, to form Aventis.

What about the American group who received the patent? What corporate entities has it set up to manufacture and distribute the abortion drug?

After receiving the U.S rights to RU486 … in 1994, the Population Council, working with a lawyer … by the name of Joseph Pike, set up a series of companies to handle various aspects of the production, distribution, and marketing of RU486.

Pike and the Council first established a non-profit called Advances in Health Technology to promote the drug and provide public education and handle doctor training. Advances also received the license to manufacture and distribute mifepristone which it turned around and granted as sub-licenses to two other for-profit companies set up by Pike, Danco Laboratories and Neogen Pharmaceuticals, Inc….

Pike controlled both of the sub-licensees through a company called N.D. Management. N.D. Management, in turn, was the sole general partner of Neogen Investors and a limited partner, along with Neogen Investors, in a group named Neogen Holdings, LP. Neogen Holdings was the sole shareholder of Danco, while Neogen Investors was the sole shareholder of Neogen Pharmaceuticals. Outside investors thus gained some stake in both the abortifacient and non-abortifacient uses of mifepristone through their participation in Neogen Investors….

Reports appearing in 1999 and 2000 have referred to the Danco Group, rather than Advances/Neogen, as “the company licensed to market RU-486″ or the “company sponsoring mifepristone in the United States. …

While articles have identified the Danco Group as “a start-up pharmaceutical company” in New York (the original Danco Laboratories was set up in California and incorporated in the Cayman Islands, these reports and others suggest that other unnamed firms are the actual manufacturers….

~ ~ ~

From Conspirators’ Hierarchy, by Dr. John Coleman:

The Round Table’s driving philosophy was to have Round Tablers in positions to formulate and carry out social policies through social institutions whereby what Ruskin called “the masses” could be manipulated….

What then are we looking at? . . . In the Committee of 300, which has a 150-year history, we have some of the most brilliant intellects assembled to form a completely totalitarian, absolutely controlled “new” society — only it isn’t new, having drawn most of its ideas from the Clubs of Cultus Diabolicus.

It strives toward a One World Government rather well described by one of its late members, H.G. Wells, in his work commissioned by the Committee which Wells boldly called: “THE OPEN CONSPIRACY— PLANS FOR A WORLD REVOLUTION.”

It was a bold statement of intent, but not really so bold since nobody believed Wells except the Great Superior Ones, the Anenherbes and those who were what we would call “insiders” today. Here is an extract of what Wells proposed:

“The Open Conspiracy will appear first, I believe, as a conscious organization of intelligent, and in some cases, wealthy men, as a movement having distinct social and political aims…

“A One-World Government and one-unit monetary system under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists who self-select from their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages.

“In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population.

“There shall be no middle class, only rulers and servants….

“Marriage shall be outlawed and there shall be no family life as we know it. Children shall be removed from their parents at an early-age and brought up by wards as state property…. Women will be degraded through the continued process of ‘women’s liberation’ movements. Free sex shall be mandatory.

“Failure to comply at least once by the age of 20 shall be punishable by severe reprisals against her person. Self-abortion shall be taught and practiced after two children are born to a woman; such records shall be contained in the personal file of each woman in the One World Government’s regional computers.

“If a woman falls pregnant after she has previously given birth to two children, she shall be forcibly removed to an abortion clinic for such an abortion and sterilization to be carried out….”

So much for the “Woman’s Right to Choose.”

$ $ $


by J.C. Willke, MD

After fighting abortion for 30 years I thought I had seen and heard it all, but not so. Here is a new development, a coordinated high-tech industry functioning for the specific purpose of obtaining and selling high-quality fetal organs for research.

Partial-Birth Abortions seemed to be so horrible that most of us wondered how such procedures could be defended. Many of us chalked it up to the fact that the pro-abortion advocates and the abortion industry didn’t want to give one inch for fear that their whole house of cards will fold. I, among others, felt that their resistance to forbidding this gruesome procedure was a fear of a domino effect….

But now we have evidence of a very clear additional reason why they want these late-term abortions to continue.

The reason is that this is the one method that gives them intact fetal bodies from which they can obtain organs for research.

The other method of late-term abortion, D&D (Dilatation and Evacuation), involves reaching up into the uterus and dismembering the live baby. This delivers pieces of macerated organs that are usually unsuitable for fetal research, transplantation, etc. This may be the main reason for their vehement defense of the practice of Partial-Birth abortion.

The story was broken recently by Life Dynamics under the guidance of its director Mark Crutcher. A lady came to him with a story, which he has verified. The name of the informant cannot be revealed, as she is still involved in the work that she has exposed….

She worked for “an outside source, hired with a team to go in [to late term abortion clinics] to dissect and procure fetal tissue for high-quality sales.”

Read on as Kelly (not her real name) describes her macabre profession….

“What we did was to have a contract with an abortion clinic that would allow us to go there on certain days. We would get a generated list each day to tell us what tissue researchers, pharmaceutical companies and universities were looking for. Then we would examine the patient charts….”

“We were looking for eyes, livers, brains, thymuses [lymphoid tissue], cardiac blood, cord blood, blood from the liver, even blood from the limbs….”

Kelly stated, “We would sell the tissue to private contractors. They in turn would sell to other universities and researchers. There was a high demand every week to buy such fetal tissues. It was shipped by UPS, FedEx, Airborne and sometimes by special couriers….”

And then the obvious question. Kelly is still working for this company, so why did she come and tell this story to a pro-life group?

One day she when she was working, “A set of twins at 24 weeks gestation was brought to us in a pan. They were both alive. The doctor came back and said, ‘Got you some good specimens, twins.’

I looked at him and said, ‘There’s something wrong here. They are moving. I don’t do this. This is not in my contract.’…”

“I told him I would not be part of taking their lives. So he took a bottle of sterile water and poured it in the pan until the fluid came up over their mouths and noses, letting them drown. I left the room because I could not watch this.”

But she did go back to dissect them after they were dead. She said, “That’s when I decided it was wrong. I did not want to be there when that happened.”

And then it happened again and again … ”At 16 weeks, all the way up to sometimes even 30 weeks, and we had live births come back to us.”

And then?

“Then the doctor would either break the neck or take a pair of tongs and beat the fetus until it was dead….”

She was asked if the type of abortion procedure was intentionally altered to deliver to you an intact specimen, even if that meant giving you a live baby?

Her answer was, “Yes, that was so we could sell better tissue, so that our company would make more money. At the end of the year, they would give the clinic back more money because we got good specimens….”

From the Life Issues Institute, Inc., July 1999,
(Compliments of
Connector and Warroom)

# # #



For more of the World’s Greatest Greed

















FAIR USE NOTICE. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

For more information go to: . If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Last Updated on December 20, 2006 by The Catbird