The Drudge Report has had headlines about this scandal several times lately:
Rich Israelis Seeking ‘Rejuvenation’
Linked To Horrifically Murdered
By: Sorcha Faal, What Does It Mean?
In a World gone completely insane, there are very few reports we research that
truly shock us on all levels as human beings, today one such report has shaken us all
due to its sheer horrific brutality,the murdering and butchery of new-born
babies for their stem cells and internal organs so that rich Westerners are
able to have what are called ‘Rejuvenation’ treatments.
From today’s FSB reports there is apparent confirmation supporting the
allegations made by one of Ukraine’s top prosecutors, Irina Bogomolova, who was
dismissed from her investigation involving the murdering of newborn babies for
their stem cells and organs, and as also confirmed by Western media sources, and
as we can read as reported by Britain’s Telegraph News Service in their article
titled “Stem cell baby deaths probe ‘too close to the truth’, claims investigator“,
and which says:
“A Ukrainian investigator looking into claims that new-born babies were killed to
harvest their stem cells and internal organs says she was removed from the case
after demanding that the inquiry be extended to all Ukraine’s maternity hospitals.
Irina Bogomolova, who works in the chief prosecutor’s office in the capital, Kiev,
claims she was taken off the case because she came too close to the truth while
investigating allegations made by women who claim their babies were taken away
from them immediately after birth.
She said: “I was sacked for political reasons. I demanded an investigation into all
maternity wings in hospitals across Ukraine and I was relieved of duty after
making that demand. “A trade in stem cells exists here… I suspect there is a lot of
bribery going on, right up to highest levels.” Pregnant women, especially from rural
areas, are very vulnerable targets as they will obviously believe whatever the
doctors tell them. It’s easy to take their babies from them and tell them they
died or were born dead due to complications.”
The Council of Europe is to investigate allegations that newborn babies, and
foetuses, have been killed to provide stem cells and internal organs for
controversial medical and cosmetic treatments. Officials of the Strasbourg-based
human rights organisation are to travel to Ukraine in February to investigate the
role played by some of the country’s research centres and maternity hospitals in
the international trade.”
Even more disturbing about these reports are the ‘links’ provided between
numerous Ukrainian Maternity Hospitals and Israel’s pharmaceutical giant Teva
Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.*,who are alleged to be the purchasers of these
murdered babies stem cells, and organs, through its alliance with Jerusalem-based Gamida Cell.
The Gamida Cell Company’s research is described as:
“Gamida Cell is developing drugs based on stem-cell research. Stem cells are
primordial cells, early in development and non-differentiated. In response to
biochemical stimuli (that are not well understood), the stem cells differentiate
into specific ones, such as heart, nerve, muscle, epidermis and so on.”
To the actual process of older humans being able to be rejuvenated by the stem
cells of babies we can read:
“According to modern science, there are no natural laws preventing successful
rejuvenation. Aging is an accumulation of damage to macromolecules, cells, tissues
and organs. If any of that damage can be repaired, the result is rejuvenation.
There have been many experiments which have been shown to increase the
maximum life span of laboratory animals, thereby achieving life extension. A few
experimental methods such as replacing hormones to youthful levels have had
considerable success in partially rejuvenating laboratory animals and humans.
There are at least eight important hormones that decline with age: 1. human
growth hormone (HGH); 2. the sexual hormones: testosterone or
estrogen/progesterone; 3. erithropoietin EPO; 4. insulin; 5. DHEA; 6. melatonin; 7.
thyroid; 8. pregnenolone. In theory, if all or some of these hormones are replaced,
the body will respond to them as it did when it was younger, thus repairing and
restoring many body functions. This seems to be borne out in hundreds of
thousands of persons who have replaced hormones for many years, especially
human growth hormone (HGH, a.k.a. GH).
Most attempts at genetic repair have traditionally involved the use of a retrovirus
to insert a new gene into a random position on a chromosome. But by attaching zinc
fingers (which determine where transcription factors bind) to endonucleases
(which break DNA strands) homologous recombination can be induced to correct
and replace defective (or undesired) DNA sequences. The first applications of this
technology are to isolate stem cells from the bone marrow of patients having blood
disease mutations, to correct those mutations in laboratory dishes using zinc
finger endonucleases and to transplant the stem cells back into the patients.
Regenerative medicine uses three different strategies:
Implantation of stem cells from culture into an existing tissue structure
Implantation of stem cells into a tissue scaffold that guides restoration or
Induction of residual cells of a tissue structure to regenerate the necessary body
To the moral implications of the World’s rich being able to extend their lives via
the murdering of new-born babies there are no historical counterparts, but does
serve as yet another horrific example of how degenerate of Mind and Soul the
Western peoples have truly become.
It should also be noted that these FSB reports linking the Israelis, and the
Western peoples, to these Ukrainian baby murders could also be a part of the
ongoing, and increasing, propaganda war currently underway between Russia and
the Western Powers over Russia’s refusal to accept new United Nations laws over
the Serbian breakaway region of Kosovo, and which the United States is preparing
to us on its own territory for the establishment of their North American Union
comprising the Nations of the United States, Mexico and Canada.
and…what is their connection with our new Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates?
March 23, 2003
PARENTS SEEK NEW INQUIRY INTO
HARVESTING OF INFANTS’ ORGANS
By Lizette Alvarez, New York Times
DUBLIN, Ireland – When Flonnuala O’Reilly’s baby boy, Michael, who was born with
severe birth defects, died at 5 months during exploratory surgery, she asked to
be allowed to dress him in his yellow baby outfit.
O’Reilly gave the infant a final hug, then buried him in a white coffin no bigger than
a Moses basket.
Five years later, when news organizations reported that hospitals in Dublin had
been removing children’s organs during autopsies and storing them for research
without the parents’s knowledge, O’Reilly drummed up the courage to call Our
Lady’s Hospital for Sick Children in Crumlin, the country’s largest pediatric
hospital. In a meeting with hospital officials, she was told that her son’s heart and
lungs had, in fact, been “retained.”
“I was being told that my son’s organs are being kept in a bucket of formaldehyde
down there,” O’Reilly said.
“My child’s life relegated to a few spare body parts. My beautiful child.”
Since that meeting in 1999, O’Reilly, like hundreds of other parents in Ireland who
discovered that their children’s organs had been removed without their knowledge,
has sought answers to many questions.
Some were quickly answered: The hospital said it had not asked O’Reilly’s
permission to remove the organs because it did not want to further upset her
after she had just lost a child. Apologies were made, and the practice stopped.
But questions about why the organs were removed and whether anyone profited
from the practice await the completion of an independent government inquiry
started in 2001.
Now, O’Reilly and other parents, distressed at the slow pace and ineffectiveness at
the slow pace and ineffectiveness of that investigation, are demanding a new one,
which they say must have subpoena power to compel the hospitals to explain their
At least 50 families, facing a three-year statute of limitations, have also gone to
court to retain their right to sue.
Charlotte Yeates, 50, was the first mother to telephone a hospital and ask about
her daughter’s organs after she saw a documentary on television about a similar
scandal in Bristol, England. After she took her story to the media, others, like
O’Reilly, also started making inquiries.
Yeates, O’Reilly and others formed an organization called Parents for Justice,
which now includes 800 families, and lobbied hard for information.
The parents found that the removal and use of organs for research dated at least
to 1970, and was routine and legal, in about 200 hospitals and other health care
facilities. A few hospitals had for small amounts of money sent pituitary glands
to pharmaceutical companies that were researching dwarfism.
Some hospitals said that pathologists stored the organs in the hope of preventing
similar deaths. They said they did not think there was anything wrong with the
practice. It had never been questioned.
“The extent of the organ retention was a shock even to people in the profession,”
said Dr. Declan Keane, the head of the National Maternity Hospital in Dublin,
which was among the first to return stored organs to parents.
When the government opened its inquiry, it promised a report in six months.
Hospital cooperation was voluntary out of concerns about patient confidentiality.
Once a report was issued, the Irish Parliament would decide whether to do its own
But the investigation has lagged. Paul Cantwell, the assistant principal for the
Department of Health and Children, is expected to finish the section on pediatric
hospitals by the end of the year.
Soon after news broke, the government ordered hospitals to return stored organs
and change their policies, and they did. Families began arriving to pick up their
children’s organs or to learn that the organs had been burned.
Now families whose children must undergo a post-mortem examination are
explicitly asked their permission to remove and store organs for research.
Ask most people about the master race mentality and they will point to Adolf
Hitler and the Nazis. But again, it is not as simple as that.
The plan for a master race and the elimination of ‘lesser’ races did not begin and
end in Nazi Germany. It began long before and it is still going on….
This master race mentality is another part of the Elite’s plan for the New World
Order. . . . The Nazis were doing and saying publicly what the Elite in Britain and
America had been saying and funding long before the word Nazi was even heard of.
EUGENICSis, to quote the Oxford Concise Dictionary, “… the production of
fine offspring by the improvement of inherited qualities.”
The term eugenics was coined by the Englishman, Francis Galton, in the later years
of the 19th century. He called for society to intervene to maintain racial purity.
Galton wanted the forced sterilisation of the ‘unfit’.
Another ‘pioneer’ of this mindset was Thomas Robert Malthus, born in 1766. It
was from him that the theory of the ‘survival of the fittest’ was passed on
through Herbert Spencer to Charles Darwin.
Malthus was obsessed with the culling of the population and proposed a series of
measures against the ‘lower races’ (the poor), to keep the population down and , as
he saw it, to prevent the human genetic stream being dominated by such ‘inferior’
In his best known work, Essay, he suggested that streets should be made narrower
and more people crowded into houses, to encourage the return of the plague.
Villages should be built next to stagnant pools and, above all, remedies for
preventing and curing disease ought to be strongly condemned, he said.
Malthus went on: “We are bound in justice and honour formally to disclaim the
right of the poor to support. To this end, I should propose a regulation be made
declaring that no child born … should ever be entitled to parish assistance…. The
[illegitimate] infant is comparatively speaking, of little value to society, as others
will immediately supply its place…. All children beyond what would be required to
keep up the population to this [desired] level, must necessarily perish, unless room
be made for them by the deaths of grown persons.”
From such a mind did the idea of the ‘survival of the fittest’ emerge, and it has
dominated ‘science’ ever since! Add to this the belief that the intellect of a
person is genetically determined by the intellect of the parents and you have the
eugenics movement, which came to the surface so infamously under the rule of
Names … such as the Harrimans and the Rockefellers, were seriously into eugenics.
Averell Harriman’s mother funded the launch of the race-science movement in
America in 1910, and built the Eugenics Record Office as a branch of the Galton
National Laboratory in London. The Harrimans were responsible for the Bush
family fortune and they were close to another Bush family backer, George
Herbert Walker (a relative by marriage of Prescott Bush and grandfather to
George Bush, who would go on to be President of the United States).
By the late 19th century, some mentally ill people and children were being sterilised
by US health officials as a result of eugenics policies. The State of Indiana made
the sterilisation of the mentally ill and ‘undesirables’ compulsory and 475 men were
sterilised at the Indiana State Reformatory.
After the turn of the century, the Harrimans and Rockefellers spent more than
$11 million to establish a eugenics research laboratory at Cold Springs Harbor on
Long Island, New York, close to the Dulles brothers’ estates. The study of
eugenics was encouraged at the Elite-controlled universities, such as Harvard,
Columbia, and Cornell.
In Germany, the same line was taken by Ernst Haeckel, the mystic and Aryan
master race promoter, whose ideas would influence Hitler. Haeckel said it was the
duty of a nation to enforce breeding, and he and his supporters formed the Monist
League to promote their sick beliefs in Germany.
The first International Congress of Eugenics was held in London in 1912. Among
its directors were Winston Churchill and Alexander Graham Bell, inventor of the
telephone. By 1917, fifteen US States had eugenics laws, and all but a few of them
made legal the compulsory sterilisation of epileptics, the mentally ill and retarded,
and regular criminals.
In 1932, a year before Hitler and Roosevelt came to power, the Harrimans helped
to organise the Third International Congress on Eugenics at the American
Museum of Natural History in New York. . . . These wealthy American families, like
their counterparts in Britain, feel themselves to be racially superior and they wish
to protect their racial purity. This— along with the pursuit of power, wealth, and
influence— is the reason why so many intermarriages take place within these
The aim of the eugenics movement was, and is, to create a Master Race by
the sterilisation and forced birth control of those races considered ‘inferior’.
The International Congress of Eugenics in New York in 1932 tackled the ‘problem’
(as they saw it) of African-Americans and other ‘inferior’ stock reproducing and
expanding their numbers. It was decided that the way to deal with this ‘danger’ to
the higher races (themselves) was through sterilisation and ‘cutting off the bad
The Congress was dedicated to the work of Averell Harriman’s mother and Averell
did his best to support the proceedings. He personally arranged for the Hamburg-Amerika Shipping Line (controlled by himself, George Walker and Prescott Bush) to
transport Nazis from Germany to New York so they could take part in the
Congress. The best known of them was Dr. Ernst Rudin, a psychiatrist at the
Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Genealogy and Demography in Berlin. There he
occupied an entire floor with his eugenics ‘research’, and all of this was made
possible by funds provided by … the Rockefellers.
Dr. Rudin was unanimously elected president of the International Federation of
Eugenics Societies at the New York Congress, and this was, in part, a recognition
of his work as a founder of the German Society for Race Hygiene.
The eugenics movement called for the sterilisation of mental patients (mental
hygiene societies); the execution of criminals, the insane, and the terminally ill
(euthanasia societies); and race purification by sterilization and the prevention of
births to those considered inferior bloodstocks (population control societies). All
of this was up and running long before anyone had heard of Adolf Hitler and the
Nazis. Hitler’s Germany was a vehicle for part of this movement; it wasn’t the
Soon after Hitler had abolished elections and became dictator of Germany in 1933,
the Rockefeller-funded Dr. Rudin was commissioned to write the “Law for the
Prevention of Hereditary Diseases in Posterity”, which involved the forced
sterilisation of anyone considered genetically inferior. A quarter of a million
people who were mental patients, blind, deaf, or alcoholics were sterilised on the
order of special eugenics courts….
But where did the Nazi Rudin get his inspiration from for the wording of his race
From the Model Eugenical Sterilization Law of 1922, presented by H.H.
Laughlin, the eugenics ‘expert’ of the US House of Representatives Committee on
Immigration and Nationalisation, which was accepted by many States.
Eugenics was not unique to Nazi Germany. In 1942, the American ‘psychiatrist’
Foster Kennedycalled for the killing of retarded children, and between 1941
and ‘43 more than 42,000 people were sterilised in America.
Nor did the master race mentality end in 1945 with the demise of Hitler’s
Germany. Obviously, talk of master races, racial purity, and sterilisation to
improve the stock was bad PR, once some of the tales of Nazi projects began to be
known. But all that happened was that the names for master race policies were
changed to disguise the true meaning.
We began to hear about euthanasia and population control instead of eugenics and
race purification, but it’s all the same thing really. What the Harrimans,
Rockefellers, and people like Prescott Bush were funding and supporting before
and during the war, their successors have continued to promote under the cover of
For instance, one of the people who worked with the Harrimans and Prescott Bush
in their funding of Hitler was William H. Draper Jr., the man who helped to fund
the Nazi cartels and was then appointed by Roosevelt after the war to decide what
should be done with them.
Draper, a close associate of Averell Harriman, was a major funder of the
International Eugenics Congress before the war and was one of those responsible
for making Dr. Ernst Rudin, the head of the world eugenics movement. In 1958,
Draper was appointed to chair a committee which was advising President Dwight
Eisenhower on the use of military aid to other countries.
This appointment was made possible by Prescott Bush, who was then a US Senator
for Connecticut. Bush was a regular golf partner of the president and of National
Security Advisor Gordon Gray (a close friend and eugenics promoter).
By now, John Foster Dulles (Bush’s former lawyer during the funding of Hitler)
was the Secretary of State, and his brother, Allen Dulles (formerly with
Schroder, Hitler’s personal bankers) was head of the CIA.
To put it mildly, a eugenics enthusiast like Draper had many people around him of
like mind. This allowed him to change the whole thrust of his committee from that
of advising on military aid to campaigning on the threat of the ‘population
explosion’. His committee formulated plans to depopulate the poorer countries: i.e.
those people who do not have white skins. The growth of such peoples, said
Draper, was a threat to the national security of the United States.
Eisenhower dismissed Draper’s proposals, but with support from his fellow racial
purity fanatics, he went on to found thePopulation Crisis Committee/’Draper
Fund’, which—together with the Rockefeller and DuPont families— continued to
promote eugenics under the guise of population control.
Draper was advisor toPresident Lyndon Johnson on this subject and that
administration began to use the overseas aid programme to fund birth control in
Another of Draper’s like-minds in American politics was to be Prescott’s son,
George Bush, a vocal supporter of General Draper’s policies. Bush arranged
hearings as early as 1969 into the dangers posed by the birth of too many black
Draper’s son and heir, William H. Draper III, was co-chairman for finance and
head of fundraising for the George Bush For President campaign in 1980.
Later in that decade, Bush persuaded Ronald Reagan to appoint the younger Draper
to be administrator of theUnited Nations Development Programme, an
organisation connected with the World Bank and charged with supervising
Eugenics and master race policies were passed on across the generations of these
ruling families of the Elite. During George Bush’s tenure in the White House, the
population control element of the aid budget soared. His legal counsel from 1980
was Boyden Gray, who became the chief legal advisor to the President during the
Gray would have been able to give him plenty of advice on population control. When
Boyden was a boy after the war, his father,Gordon Gray (Prescott Bush’s close
friend), launched the project which provided the basis of today’s global
In 1946, the eugenics movement was trying to rebuild itself in the wake of the
rather unfortunate publicity aroused by on of its chief advocates, Adolf Hitler.
During the war, The Sterilization League of America had changed its name toBirthright Inc., and was now looking for a means to get back to business.
Its efforts to relaunch itself in Iowa ended when a young boy died during a
sterilisation operation and the bad publicity brought an end to the plan. Instead
they moved to Gray family territory in North Carolina.
Gordon Gray had founded the Bownam Gray (Memorial) Medical School in
Winston-Salem. It was named after Boyden’s grandfather, who had owned the
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company.
The school became a centre for eugenics. It compiled extensive records of
families carrying ‘inherited diseases’, and it began a project which … get this …
forcibly sterilised young children who were not considered to be of a high enough
No, no. I am not talking about Nazi Germany during the war; I am talking
about the United States of America in 1946-1947!
Boyden Gray’s great aunt, Alice Shelton Gray, founded the Human Betterment
League (the North Carolina branch of the national eugenics sterilisation
movement), and she was the official supervisor of the master race experiment
that was begun at the Grays’ ‘medical school’.
Others involved were Dr. Claude Nash Herndon, the assistant director of
‘medical genetics’ at the school, andDr. Clarence Gamble(the heir to the Proctor
and Gamble soap empire), who was the chief of ‘national field operations’.
Children enrolled in the Winston-Salem school district were given ‘intelligence
tests’ and those who fell below the mark considered acceptable to these
bizarre people were sterilised.
Their recommendations were passed to the State Eugenics Board, which had the
authority to order sterilisation under North Carolina law. Dr. Claude Nash
Herdon talked of his work in an interview in 1990 which was reported in George
Bush, The Unauthorised Biography:
“…IQ tests were run on all the children in the Winston-Salem school system. Only
the ones who scored really low [were targeted for sterilisation], the real bottom
of the barrel, like below 70. Did we do sterilizations on young children? Yes. This
was a relatively minor operation. … It was usually not [done] until the child was
eight or ten years old. For the boys, you just make an incision and tie the tube. …
We more often performed the operation on girls than with boys. Of course, you
have to cut open the abdomen, but again, it is relatively minor.”
Oh, that’s OK then. What were the media doing while all this was going on? Not a
lot, it turns out. Dr. Herndon talked of their “good relationship” with the press.
This is less surprising when you realize thatGordon Gray owned theWinston-Salem Journal, the Twin City Sentineland the radio stationWSJS.
Eugenics was being promoted on a wide scale after the war in the guise of
population control, just as it is today. In the early 50s, when John Foster Dulles
was chairman of the tax-exempt New World Order front, the Rockefeller
Foundation, he travelled with John D. Rockefeller III on a number of world tours
campaigning for policies to stem the expansion of the non-white populations.
In November 1952, Dulles and Rockefeller launched the Population Council with
tens of millions of dollars provided by the Rockefeller family. The American
Eugenics Society left its old headquarters at Yale University, the home of the
sinister Skull and Bones Society, and moved in with the Population Council. The
two organisations, in effect, became one.
The first president of the Population Council was Frederick Osborne, the long-time
secretary of the American Eugenics Society. The child-steriliser of North
Carolina, Dr. Claude Nash Herndon, was made president of the Eugenics Society
When George Bush became ambassador to the United Nations in 1972, he and his
clique inthe US Agency for International Development arranged the first
official contract between the American government and the Sterilization League
of America, which had, by then, changed its name yet again, to the Association for
Voluntary Surgical Contraception.
Under this contract, the US government (taxpayers) began to fund this
organisation to do in non-white countries of the world what it had already done to
children in North Carolina.
In 1988, the year George Bush was elected president, another contract was
arranged which involved the American taxpayer spending $80 million over five
years to expand this work in 58 countries in Asia, Africa, and Spanish-America.
Millions have been sterilised and most of it has been funded by the taxpayer.
Other countries do the same. And by the way, Dr. Clarence Gamble, the
sterilising enthusiast from the Proctor and Gamble soap family and the Bowman
Gray Medical School, as also enjoyed funding from the USAID budget.
His so-called Pathfinder Fund is paid to infiltrate non-white societies and break
down resistance to sterilisation.
ThePlanned Parenthood Federation, which has been supported at every
opportunity by George Bush and the manipulating Elite, was actually founded in
London, at the offices of the British Eugenics Society….
WASHINGTON – For the past nine years Boyd Ed Graves has lived with HIV.
Since the beginning of his research in 1992, he has become one of the world’s most
recognized AIDS activists.
For the last two years, Mr. Graves has chargedthe U.S. government with the
creation of this disease as a part of an overall plan to eliminate world
populations, Blacks in particular.
He also asserts that the plan and its execution has cost U.S. taxpayers $550
million and that he has discovered evidence of an AIDS-virus flow chart produced
by the government that he says proves his claim.
Until recently, these assertions beyond the scientific community have been at best
alarming. Many critics sought to disprove them. However, the recently piqued
interest of an Ohio congressman has breathed new life in the activist’s war on the
Rep. James A. Traficant Jr.(D-Ohio) has expressed interest in Mr. Graves’
claims and is in the process of organizing a hearing on the Special Virus Cancer
Program of the U.S. government that ran from 1962-1978. According to published
reports, he has also asked the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) to provide an
account of American tax dollars allegedly provided for the project.
Rep.Traficant, no stranger to theories of government conspiracy, was the lead
congressional investigator into the ill-fated TWA flight 800 that, in 1996, crashed
shortly after takeoff from Kennedy International Airport into the Atlantic Ocean.
“What we expect initially from Congressman Traficant is to have him on the floor
of the House to unveil the flow chart,” said Dr. Graves, who also is director of
AIDS Concerns for the International Medical Research Foundation of the group
Common Cause in Ontario, Canada.
“If you follow the money, we can get to the heart of this issue. The GAO sent
a letter on Aug. 20, that indeed they had looked into the preliminary information
that they had received from the congressman, the flowchart and the budget for
this program and were calling for an additional investigation from the Health Care
Team of the GAO,” he said.
“The congressman has agreed to ask for an investigation by the GAO or the
Congressional Committee on Investigations,” said Anthony Traficanti, the
congressman’s regional director.
“The information presented by Dr. Graves is very shocking and very revealing. Our
government is supposed to be sensitive to the people’s concerns and the flowchart
was very revealing to me,” he said in a recent interview with The Buckeye Review.
The 1971 U.S. Special AIDS Virus Flow Chart was unveiled in October 1999 by Dr.
Graves at the Western Reserve Historical Society in Cleveland, Ohio. It
coordinates over 20,000 scientific papers and 15 years of progress reports of a
secret, federal virus development program.
It contains within its five-section foldout, thousands of secret experiments
detailing the creation and mass production of a human immunodefeciency virus.
Independent experts agree that this program is the birthplace of HIV/AIDS and
other mysterious illnesses, according to Mr. Graves.
In 1977, this virus program produced 15,000 gallons of AIDS, he said. According
to the chart, the United States was represented byDr. Robert Gallo and the
USSR (Soviet Union) was represented by aDr. Novakhatskiy of the Ivanosky
“This was the beginnings of the plot to thin the Black population,” Mr. Graves
“The flow chart is the research logic flow of an ultra-secret federal program
called ‘The Special Virus’.”
It is the designer product of a century long hunt for a contagious cancer that will
The necessity for the creation and deployment of AIDS is fully outlined in U.S.
population control policy decisions including National Security Study Memorandum
200 (NSSM-200) of 1974, written and presented by Henry Kissinger at the mega-conference on population control held in Bucharest, Romania,” Dr. Graves told The
In January 2000, Mr. Graves filed a lawsuit against the president of the United
States charging the government created the HIV virus.
In January 2001, that case was dismissed in federal court as “frivolous.”
Last April, Dr. Graves, armed with 10,000 signatures, hand delivered to the
Supreme Court an appeals brief on the matter. It is currently under review.
Comparing the discovery as a trip through the “Land of Oz,” Dr. Graves said the
chart provides irrefutable evidence that HIV/AIDSis a design of population
control and it dispels the myths associated with the disease.
“I don’t know where you were when you saw for the first time the curtain pulled
back in the film The Wizard of Oz, and discovered that things weren’t what they
seemed. That discovery changes a person. How dare the U.S. government
perpetrate that over 70 percent of the deaths from HIV/AIDS are found in
the Black communities because we are more sexually scurrilous.
That is simply not true.
“The majority of the U.S. population is white. How then can Black women be the
fastest growing group coming down with HIV/AIDS today when the largest sexual
preferences (gay, bisexual and multi-partnered) are found among American whites?
“How does a so-called white, homosexual disease, transform itself into a
health problem for Black women?”he asked.
– The flow chart can be accessed through his websitewww.boydgraves.com
MOSCOW – The boy thought his grandmother was taking him to Disneyland, but
Russian police say she had other plans: to sell her grandson so his organs could be
used for transplants.
Police in Ryazan, 125 miles southeast of Moscow, said Saturday that they arrested
a woman after they were tipped that she was trying to sell her grandson to a man
who was going to take the boy to the West.
There his organs were to be removed and sold, a Ryazan police duty officer said….
The woman was helped in the scheme by the boy’s uncle, who told police the child
was being sold for about $70,000.
When asked how he could sell his nephew, the uncle replied: “My mother said that
it is none of my business, he is her grandson.”
The boy, whose age was not released, lived with his grandmother. Police said she
told him he was being taken to Disneyland.
Body parts have been smuggled out of Russia in the past for sale in the West as
September 30, 2000
BRITISH DOCTOR SOUGHT AFTER
CHILD BODY PARTS FOUND
LONDON, England (CNN) – Police in the Canadian province of Nova Scotia have
issued an arrest warrant for a British pathologist after children’s organs were
discovered in a warehouse.
Police in the town of Halifax say the organs appear to be from one or two children
and DNA tests are now being conducted to try to identify the remains.
The warrant for the arrest of Dr. Dick van Velzen has been issued across Canada
for “improperly or indecently interfering or offering indignity to a dead human
body or human remains,” police said.
The doctor has been linked to previous cases of the removal of organs and tissue
from dead children at the Alder Hey hospital in Liverpool, England.
An inquiry is being held in Britain into more than 800 cases of organ removals, for
which parents said they were not advised of, at the hospital.
Police in Halifax said they did not believe the organs were from local children and
had been stored at the warehouse for at least two years….
~ ~ ~
UNFORTUNATELY…THERE’S EVEN MORE OF
THE GREATEST GREED ON EARTH!
China – From Midweek, 11/8/00: China’s Brutal One-Child Policy. . . .
“BOYCOTT THE PHARMACEUTICAL
BUTCHERS OF BEIJING!”
By Michelle Malkin
Is there a protester out there brave enough to wear that phrase on a T-shirt?
Search high and low, but you will not find any … activists criticizing communist
China’s peddlers of RU-486, the abortion pill.
The Washington Post reported recently that the Hua Lian Pharmaceutical Co, a
govt-owned firm outside of Shanghai, will manufacture Mifepristone— the raw
compound for RU-486— for sale in the United States. The firm is one of three in
China that makes the drug. It won U.S. approval to produce and export abortion
drug ingredients here thanks to financial help from population control fanatics at
the Rockefeller Foundation.
Pro-abortion groups are ecstatic. But while American women celebrate their
newly-acquired “choice,” millions of pregnant women in China are forced to swallow
the poison pill against their will. It is no small coincidence that RU-486 was
originally developed by a drug company whose parent corporation manufactured
Zyklon B — the poison gas used in Nazi concentration camps to destroy millions
of unwanted lives.
Family-planning propagandists in China slyly echo the liberating rhetoric of their
“RU-486 has given women more choices, and it’s been beneficial to women’s
health,” Gao Ersheng, director of theShanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood
Research, told the Post. “Most unmarried women prefer Mifepristone, which is
less painful and more private than surgical abortions,” Gao told The New York
Preferences? Pain? Privacy?
Since when did Chinese family-planning bureaucrats care about any of those
things? Certainly not since they instituted the one-child policy in 1979. An army
of 200,000 officials and a million volunteers who comprise “street committees”
snoop on the fertility of Chinese citizens. The government keeps dossiers tracking
women’s menstrual cycles.
All women who “choose” to undergo surgical abortions “prefer” to do so without
Out of an estimated 10 million abortions performed in China each year, the
Washington Post reports, about half of those that are performed in the cities use
RU-486. The other five million women undergo such methods as saline injections
to induce miscarriage; Ribalor injections, which cause congestive heart failure in
the unborn baby, who is then delivered dead; or partial-birth abortions in which
doctors inject formaldehyde into a baby’s soft spot as the child crowns during
“Neither abortion nor RU-486 is a subject for moral debate in China in the way it
is in the United States,” the Post noted. There is no debate in China about
anything. When a family disagrees with the government’s diagnosis, the
consequences are hellish— ranging from back-breaking fines and forced
sterilization to mass infanticide. . . .
If you think government-sponsored baby-killing no longer happens in 21st century
China, you missed last month’s international headlines: “Chinese officials drown
baby in front of parents.” Huang Quisheng, a rural farmer, told London reporters
how family planners had tried to induce a miscarriage in his eight-months-pregnant
wife by injecting saline solution into her womb.
Against the odds, their baby son survived and was born healthy.
But, as Huang recounted:“They grabbed him from me and threw him to the floor
and kicked him several times. We were ordered to go home as they took him to
the back of the government building and drowned him…”
The enforcers of this brutal regime will now reapprofits by selling their deadly
abortion pills to the United States. Feminists embrace them; the White House
toasts them; a bipartisan Congress rewards them with a multibillion-dollar trade
The laboratories of an evil empire churn and bellow as millions of Chinese parents
And where are America’s human rights activists?
Boycotting Happy Meals, sneakers and Kathie Lee….
Planned Parenthood Federation of America – “One of America’s greatest
threats to the right to life”.
The Real Planned Parenthood Agenda
“Only an utterly ruthless, steely-nerved manipulator such as Sanger could have
parlayed a daring, New-Age style immorality into a massive, multi-billion dollar
enterprise so immensely powerful that in many countries (the U.S. included) it
is…like a government within a government.”
– Bernard Nathanson, MD, Pro-life former abortionist
~ ~ ~
They’re big. They’re strong. They’re powerful. They have an influential presence
in every state. They’re widely respected and revered.
And they’re one of America’s greatest threats to the right to life.
The Planned Parenthood Federation of America, which operates on a current
massive annual budget of more than $504 million (an increase of $27 million from
the previous year) and has local affiliates all across Pennsylvania and state
affiliates nationwide, has a record for ending the lives of unborn children that is
unmatched by any other institution in the free world.
Founded by Margaret Sanger, who wrote in her book Women and the New Race,
“The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is
to kill it,” Planned Parenthood continues to annually increase its involvement in
While the national abortion rate decreases, PPFA’s piece of the pie grows ever
larger. Planned Parenthood did 133,289 abortions at its centers in 1994, and
139,899 in 1995, and 153,367 in 1996.
Planned Parenthood referred women elsewhere for an additional 98,325 abortions
in 1994 and 59,682 in 1995.
In 1996, they referred women who didn’t want to parent their babies for adoption
only 6,274 times, giving them a 22-to-1 ratio in favor of abortion over adoption for
women who went to them for “help.”
This emphasis on abortion as the solution to problem pregnancies is also shown in a
report from the General Accounting Office which showed that pregnant women
who go to Planned Parenthood for counseling abort seven times more often than
women who go to other “family planning” agencies.
What’s worse, annually as much as$171.9 million of Planned Parenthood’s
funding comes from your taxes in the form of government contracts and
Their other funding comes from income from the clinics ($180.5 million annually),
private and corporate contributions ($122.7 million annually) and other sources.
In addition to activities directly related to doing and promoting abortions, Planned
Parenthood acts as one of the most powerfullobbyingorganizations in favor of
abortion on demand. PPFA’s annual report from 1993-94 reported on eight pending
lawsuits against state regulations of abortion, including four cases in which PPFA
was petitioning the courts to be given public funds that democratically elected
state legislatures had refused to administer to them.
In Pennsylvania, Planned Parenthood seemed to have a real problem with parents,
as they sued the state, holding up legislation allowing parental involvement in
minors’ abortion decisions for five years in the courts, at great cost to
(Source – PA Pro-Life Federation) Contact us at:firstname.lastname@example.org
* * *
Get the Facts on Planned Parenthood
by Brian Clowes, PhD
Human Life International has long been at the forefront of the battle against the
Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA), by exposing its true anti-life
agenda throughout the world.
Most of our readers know that PPFA is a pro-abortion group and that it commits
surgical abortions on a large scale. But not all yet realize the insidious nature of
PPFA and its horrific impact on society as the behemoth of the abortion industry.
In the United States, about 20,000 staff and volunteers operate 142 Planned
Parenthood affiliates and their 900 clinics, 130 of which commit surgical abortions.
In 1996, PPFA recorded an income of over half a billion dollars, one-third of
which was taken out of taxpayers’ pockets.
In the same year, the organization committed 153,367 surgical abortions and
referred 54,207 more; administered nearly a million pregnancy tests; had nearly
two million birth control customers; filed suit against dozens of pro-life laws; and
pushed explicit sex education programs all over the country….
These numbers give some idea of the colossal impact that Planned Parenthood has
on millions of people every year, and tragically our youth….
PPFAs Involvement in Surgical and Chemical Abortion
In 1984, Faye Wattleton, then-President of PPFA, said “We know that the
abortion issue is our issue.” Abortion has always been Planned Parenthood’s number
On 1 July 1970, the state of New York legalized abortion. PPFA was so eager to
begin exterminating preborn lives that it committed its first abortion the very
next day. It now owns the biggest chain of abortion factories in the country and
has committed nearly two and a half million abortions in the last 28 years——a
number equivalent to the populations of St. Louis, San Diego, Phoenix, Pittsburgh
Ever anxious to exploit new ways of exterminating the preborn, PPFA now pushes
so-called “post-coital contraception” in a big way. The group recommends “doubling
up” on birth control pills in order to enhance their abortifacient effect to end the
life of an early developing human being. In 1996, PPFA gave this abortifacient to
nearly 30,000 women, and will administer it to 50,000 more this year.
It is also beginning to administer methotrexate/misoprostol (“MTX”) chemical
abortions, and has declared its intention to distribute the RU-486 abortion pill on
a massive scale as soon as it becomes available.
To show how lopsidedly it emphasizes only one choice——abortion——PPFA commits
or refers ten surgical abortions for each referral for prenatal care or adoption.
PPFA’s Aggressive Pro-Abortion Litigation
Planned Parenthood has demonstrated its absolute commitment to abortion by
acting as a plaintiff in hundreds of lawsuits against pro-life laws in almost every
state, even when such laws are supported by the vast majority of the people and
the state legislatures.
A Planned Parenthood executive was the plaintiff in the 1965 Supreme Court case
that discovered the mythical “right to privacy”——Griswold v. Connecticut. Today,
PPFA fights any limits on abortion, regardless of how trivial they are. It has
opposed informed consent laws, waiting periods for minors, parental or spousal
consent or notification, decent burial or cremation for aborted preborn babies, and
even attempts to set standards for the licensing of abortion mills, which would
safeguard the health of women.
Planned Parenthood has even challenged bans on third-trimester D&X abortions in
several states. It also puts the lie to its claim to be a “pro-choice” group, since the
only ‘‘choice’’ it supports is abortion. It has attempted to force the Roman Catholic
Church to provide abortions to children in its care and has even gone to court to
force high school student newspapers to accept its advertisements.
In 1970, Planned Parenthood first began receiving government money when its
clinic in Corpus Christi, Texas, received $7,000 in government support. Since
then, PPFA has swallowed more than $3.9 billion (in 1998 dollars) of our federal,
state and local tax dollars in the relentless pursuit of its comprehensive anti-life
agenda. In 1996 alone, PPFA received $177.5 million from federal, state and local
Since 1970, Federal Title X grants have been the largest single source of PPFA’s
income from outside sources, and it now receives over $40 million annually from
In light of the fact that PPFA annually rakes in tens of millions of dollars by selling
abortions and makes tens of millions more by selling birth control devices at a huge
markup, we must ask why American taxpayers—especially those who are pro-life—should continue to subsidize an organization that obviously can very easily
This vast Title X government subsidy allows PPFA to pay its operatives staggering
salaries. For example, in 1995, PPFA’s then-President, Pamela Maraldo, received a
$251,538 salary, and at least four PPFA vice presidents and other officers
received salaries ranging between $151,000 and $189,000.
Faye Wattleton said of PPFA: “We are not going to be an organization promoting
celibacy or chastity.”
Soon after the 1973 Roe v. Wade abortion decision, Planned Parenthood’s Alan
Guttmacher revealed one of the primary purposes of value-free sex education
when he admitted that “The only avenue the International Planned Parenthood
Federation and its allies could travel to win the battle for abortion on demand is
through sex education.”
This makes perfect marketing sense, and positions Planned Parenthood to
perpetuate itself forever. First, it distributes grossly offensive sex education
manuals throughout the United States. Teens who might otherwise be chaste
learn from these books that it is “perfectly normal” to have sex, and so they visit
the local Planned Parenthood clinic and pick up contraceptives. When the
contraceptives fail (as they frequently do, especially among teens), then they
return to the Planned Parenthood clinic for an abortion or a referral for an
This is a self-maintaining system that any marketer would be envious of: Make
money by creating the demand for your products and services, and then reap
further profits from selling them.
All of PPFA’s sex education manuals tell our children that they can embrace the
complete line of anti-life behavior and be guilt-free: fornication, masturbation,
contraception, abortion, pornography and homosexual acts. These manuals also
repeat the old Kinsey line that “humans are sexual beings from before birth until
death.” For example, Planned Parenthood’s sex-ed text The New Positive Images
talks about “erections of penis” and “possibility of orgasm” — to three-year-old
In addition to promoting immorality, Planned Parenthood has vigorously attacked
sex education programs that teach any standard of morality. PPFA has filed
lawsuits whose purpose is to ban effective abstinence-based sex education
programs from high schools, on the grounds that they “violate the separation of
church and state” by teaching a “religious point of view” ——i.e., chastity and self-control.
This proves that PPFA believes such effective programs are threats to its income
and influence. After all, Planned Parenthood doesn’t make any money from kids
The objections that most pro-life organizations raise against Planned Parenthood
are not only religious in nature, but profoundly practical as well. The natural and
inevitable consequences of the permissive agenda pushed by PPFA and other anti-life groups are devastating from a public health standpoint. Abortion, teen
fornication, illegitimate births, child abuse and child poverty, “shacking up,”
venereal diseases, and divorce have increased tremendously since 1970.
These in turn have led to other baleful results, from millions more women and
children living in poverty to a general relaxing of moral standards and society’s
willingness to accept other atrocities such as physician-assisted suicide, cloning
and frozen human embryos.
Planned Parenthood’s lavish funding also allows it to attack those who try to slow
the deterioration of the health and morals of our society. PPFA has attacked pro-lifers and pro-life laws in the courts at all levels, thereby stripping any legal
protection from pre-born babies and their defenders.
Every local pro-life group and individual that joins the battle against this anti-life
monster weakens it and ultimately makes it easier for all pro-lifers to do their
Just three years ago, most of the world celebrated the fiftieth anniversary of the
defeat of Hitler’s Third Reich, perpetrators of the Holocaust in Europe. This
month marks the twenty-fifth year of the continuing political battle over our
American Holocaust: the legalized murder by abortion of over 35 million unborn
The legalization of abortion in America was perpetrated by the Supreme Court in
its infamous decision in Roe vs. Wade. The organization most responsible for the
cultural and political changes leading to the court’s decision is the Planned
Parenthood Federation of America. That organization is considered respectable
by enough Americans that they have been able to obtain significant (about one
third of their budget) funding through tax dollars.
Just how respectable is Planned Parenthood? Their status as one of the largest
abortion “providers” ought to say it all, but that isn’t enough to convince most
Americans of the organization’s depravity. Perhaps a brief glimpse at their
history will open some eyes.
Planned Parenthood began life in 1921 as the American Birth Control League, the
brainchild of extreme leftist Margaret Sanger. It evolved through mergers and
name changes into what we know today as the Planned Parenthood Federation of
Sanger’s lifelong ambition was to reduce the world’s population, particularly that
of the poor and “unfit,” through birth control. She also promoted contraception
as the means to free women from the natural consequences of the promiscuous
lifestyle that she openly practiced and recommended for everyone.
The views of Sanger’s movement can be found throughout their publications. The
Birth Control Review was replete with articles advocating everything from freely
available contraception to involuntary sterilization for “dysgenic groups in our
population.” The April 1933 issue of that publication was dedicated to the
“science” of eugenics, or selective breeding of human beings. It featured an
article by Ernst Rudin, an official of Hitler’s NAZI regime….
Planned Parenthood will claim that some of Sanger’s statements reflect opinions
that they no longer support. Certainly that is true in the case of abortion. Sanger
publicly disapproved of it; Planned Parenthood has established it as a major
As for the idea that women should have control over their own bodies, and birth
control should always be voluntary, consider this statement from former Planned
Parenthood leader Alan Guttmacher:
“Each country will have to decide its own form ofcoercion, determining when and
how it should be employed…The means presently available are compulsory
sterilization and compulsory abortion.“
I wish we had the space to elaborate much more on the history of this unholy
organization. If you have access to the Internet, you can find an amazing amount
of material on both sides of the issue.
For the case against Sanger and Planned Parenthood, start at Human Life
International’s web site at http://www.hli.org and follow their various links.
Also check out Eugenics Watch at
http://homepages.enterprise.net/eugenics/index.html for some related material.
For the pro-Sanger view, try Planned Parenthood itself at
http://www.plannedparenthood.org, and the Sanger Papers Project at
I don’t want my tax dollars to pay for any of the activities of an organization like
Planned Parenthood; nor do millions of other Americans.
Is it asking too much to require our opponents to raise their own funds for their
A fitting memorial to twenty five years of government sanctioned infanticide
under Roe vs. Wade would be for Congress to remove all federal funding from
To go to Dave Neuendorf’s Home Page
* * *
THE HISTORY OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD
by Mike Perry
“We are merely walking down the path that
Mrs. Sanger carved for us.”
–Dr. Alan Guttmacher, President of Planned Parenthood, 1962-74.
Planned Parenthood is powerful
It has the enthusiastic support of influential organizations and extensive
connections inside the government. It invariably gets favorable coverage in the
news media and each year it receives large sums of money from taxes and
community charities. Yet the public knows nothing about its history. This silence
has a reason.
Rooted in Fear
In the years after World War I, a number of competing organizations formed to
promote birth control. The most controversial of these was the American Birth
Control League (ABCL). In 1933, Eleanor Dwight Jones, the President of ABCL,
described the organization’s founders as “a devoted group of liberals and
feminists led by Margaret Sanger.”
These organizations arose out of the fears of America’s affluent, educated elite.
To have more money and time for themselves, they were having fewer children. As
a result they were alarmed by the high birth rates of poor and working-class
people. They considered the prolific poor, as Sanger put it, “the most far reaching
peril to the future of civilization.”
Two movements developed in response to these fears. Both considered the nation
a “race” that could be strengthened by keeping the birth rate of the“fit”(the
affluent) above that of the “unfit” (the poor). They differed only in whose birth
rate they wanted to change.
The eugenicists warned of “race suicide” if the nation’s dominant group, educated
people of Northern European descent, did not increase its birthrate. President
Theodore Roosevelt expressed their view in March 1905 when he attacked women
who used birth control as “criminal against the race.” This group wanted more
children from the “fit.”
The other movement, birth controllers, was more attractive to feminists such as
Margaret Sanger. It did not demand that affluent women abandon careers for
large families. It planned to achieve race building by forcing down the birth rate
of the “unfit.”…
In her autobiography, Margaret Sanger summarized the differences between the
two movements: Eugenics without birth control seemed to me a house built upon
sands…The eugenicists wanted to shift the birth-control emphasis from less
children for the poor to more children for the rich. We went back of that and
sought to stop the multiplication of the unfit.”
To stop this “multiplication,” Sanger could be harsh. Her book The Pivot of
Civilization has a chapter called “The Cruelty of Charity.” In it she blasts as
“insidiously injurious” programs to provide “medical and nursing facilities to slum
mothers.” Such programs “facilitate the function of maternity” when “the
absolute necessity is to discourage it.”
Sanger believed that a poor woman who died in childbirth gave other poor women
more incentive to visit her conveniently located birth control clinics….
Shifting Targets Revealingly
The public relations consultant who recommended the name change was not the
first to suggest “Planned Parenthood” as a name. The suggestion came in a 1938
letter from Dr. Lydia DeVilbiss, a Florida physician, birth controller and racist.
Choosing a name suggested by an open racist illustrates once again that the new
name didn’t mean a new agenda.
Dr. DeVilbiss’ influence also reflects a new priority. Racial minorities were now
more threatening than immigrants. The reason is obvious. The same elitist fears
that created the birth control movement also led to the restrictive 1924
immigration laws. (Blocked from immigrating by elitist American anti-semitism,
millions of Jews would die under the Nazis.)
In its place came a new migration. The nation’s black population was on the move.
At the turn of the century 90 percent of the nation’s blacks lived in the South.
But racism, depression, and war industry brought them north, where they replaced
immigrant Catholics and Jews in the ghettos. By the 1960s half the nation’s blacks
would live outside the South.
Similar conditions brought Hispanics to this country. Reaching these people with
birth control required new tactics. As the 1940 symposium title hints, “race
building” in a democracy has to be subtle. Coercion cannot be overt. Deception
must take the place of force. The victims must never know they are a target.
A number of tactics were used to deceive the victims.
First, birth controllers hoped (correctly) that black leaders would be easier to
manipulate than Catholic leaders had been. The movement planned to win black
cooperation by placing blacks in highly visible positions.
Sanger described this to Clarence Gamble in October 1939. In that letter she
described how “colored Ministers, preferably with social service backgrounds”
could be used and added ominously,“We do not want word to go out that we
want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can
straighten out the idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious
Clarence Gamble advocated the same tactic in a private memo that year when he
said, “There is a great danger that we will fail because the Negroes think it a plan
for extermination. Hence lets appear to let the colored think it run it as we
appear to let south do the conference at Atlanta.”
Under this policy PPFA hired a full-time “Negro Consultant” in 1944….
The Stage Is Set
The stage was set for a new strategy. Support from the wealthy and powerful was
assured. As in the days of Moses and the Pharaoh, such people were eager to
curtail the birth rates of the poor and socially troublesome.
The cooperation of the news media could be counted on. Given the large minority
populations of most big cities, journalists who never exposed the ugly anti-immigrant bigotry of the earlier “race building” birth controllers could be relied on
to keep silent about Planned Parenthood’s new agenda and particularly its impact on
black and Hispanic families….
The Play Begins
The play began in earnest during the 1960s and was motivated by several factors.
First, the civil rights movement eliminated the worst aspects of Southern racism.
The Northern liberal elite supported civil rights, in part, to reduce the pressures
driving blacks northward. (As a number of blacks have noted, liberals never
displayed much enthusiasm for combating Northern racism.) This paralleled the
post-World War I tactic of restricting immigration and then forcing down birth
rates. In a 1926 speech at Vassar, Sanger spoke of that very tactic when she said
that the nation needed to follow the “drastic immigration laws” of 1924 with
methods “to cut down on the rapid multiplication of the unfit and undesirable
Second, during the fifties Planned Parenthood had purred contentedly at the high
birth rate of white suburbia. Its eugenic (“more from the fit”) side was in control.
But after the advent of the birth control pill in 1960, middle-class birth rates
plummeted. As a result, the birth rates of racial (black and Hispanic) and religious
(conservative Catholic and Protestant) minorities became disproportionately high.
The “less from the unfit” side of Planned Parenthood again became dominant. In
the latter half of the 1960s, Planned Parenthood and similar groups spent millions
of dollars promoting the idea that the U.S. was in the midst of a dangerous
The idea was so absurd it could be disproved in five minutes at any public library.
Caught up in the hysteria, however, the nation’s news media never questioned why
groups were warning of a “population bomb” in the midst of plummeting birth
All the public warnings of a “population explosion” hid the real agenda, reducing
the birth rates of socially troublesome groups.
The problem was compounded by a third factor, the “sexual revolution” of the late
1960s. High rates of promiscuity meant still more troublesome births in both the
white and black communities….
A highly powerful and highly privileged group, abortion supporters fear any social
change that might alter their advantaged circumstances. In their efforts to
maintain the demographic status quo in spite of their low birth rate, Planned
Parenthood is one of their most useful weapons. Christianity, on the other hand, is
one of their most potent enemies….
(The original research for this article began during graduate work in Biomedical
History at the University of Washington’s medical school.)
~ ~ ~
About The Author: Mike Perry is a free-lance writer and historian. He is
currently writing a book describing the Nazi indoctrination of German youth; it is
tentatively entitled From the Tenderest Years.
The Population Council – On Sept 28, 2000, the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration approved the “abortion pill”RU-486 for use in the United States.
This represents the first time in our nation’s history that our government has ever
approved a drug for the specific purpose of taking the life of another human being.
~ ~ ~
From Population Council web site:
Our Mission . . . to improve the well-being and reproductive health of
current and future generations and to help achieve a humane, equitable,
and sustainable balance people and resources.
What is the Population Council?
We are an international, nonprofit institution that conducts research on three
fronts: biomedical, social science, and public health. This research— and the
information it produces— helps change the way people thinkabout problems
related to reproductive health and population growth….
Who started the Council, and why?
The Council was established in 1952 by John D. Rockefeller 3rd, to search for a
better understanding of problems relating to population. A humanitarian, Mr.
Rockefeller was deeply affected by trips to densely populated regions of South
and East Asia in 1950, where millions of people were living at subsistence level and
the population was growing rapidly.
What is the Council’s budget?
Our 1999 expenditures were US $66.7 million . . . The budget for 2000 isUS $76
$ $ $
And where did the $66.7 million expenditures in 1999 come from?According
to the Council, 3% came from Multilateral Organizations; 6% came from Foreign
Governments; 12% came from Internal Funds; 20% came from (unnamed)
Nongovernmental Organizations and Individuals; and
59% CAME FROM U.S. TAXPAYERS!
~ ~ ~
And how were our tax dollars spent?
According to the Population Council’s 1999 Annual Financial Report, $37,188,000
went to “International Programs”; $13,033,000 went to the Center for Biomedical
Research; $4,753,000 went to “Policy Research Division”; $359,000 went to
“Distinguished Colleagues”; $1,289,000 went to Publications; $9,581,000 went to
Management & General Services; and $515,000 went to Fundraising.
~ ~ ~
And before actually spending our tax dollars,
where did they repose?
Well, the website doesn’t say, but I suspect that a good number of them were
having fun in the sun in the Cayman Islands or some other off-shore tax-haven, or
residing in the Bank of New York, Citibank or other insider-favored institution.
What this non-profit, tax exempt entity does tell us, however, is that in 1999 they
had total assets of $176,280,000. Of this total, $110,049,000 was in Cash and
They also tell us that investment managers received 1% (or around $1,104,900
according to my fourth-grade fuzzy math) for the privilege of taking care of all
this (former) taxpayer money.
And, for this handsome sum you would think that these wise old financial owls
would earn an equally handsome return on investments in the raging bull market of
1999, wouldn’t you? Well, according to my fuzzy Economy 101 reading of the
financial statements, these experts had a Net Unrealized Loss in Fair Value of
Investments of $9,077,000 for the year.
~ ~ ~
Al Gore, speaking at the 1st Presidential Debate, and promising that he’ll defend
the woman’s right to choose, points out: “… and in the audience is my good friend,
Robert Rubin …”
~ ~ ~
Some of the Population Council’s1999 Board of Trustees:
Elizabeth J. McCormack, Chairman of the Board, Associate, Rockefeller Family
Linda G. Martin, President, Population Council, NY, NY
Jorge Balan, Program Officer, The Ford Foundation, NY, NY
Abdullahi An-Na’im, Professor of Law, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Alaka Basu, Senior Research Associate, Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY
Demissle Habte, Lead Health Specialist, Africa Technical Families, The World
Bank, Wash., DC
Werner Holzer, Bad Homburg, Germany
Charles Klein, Managing Dir., American Securities, NY, NY
Robert B. Millard, Managing Dir., Lehman Brothers, Inc., NY, NY
Nancy Birdsall, Sr Assoc, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,
Rodney B. Wagner, Vice Chairman (Retired), J.P. Morgan, NY, NY
Torsten Wiesel, President Emeritus, Rockefeller University, NY, NY
* * *
From The National Right to Life Committee website:
Mifepristone – The French Abortion Pill
RU486 is a chemical compound that, taken in pill form, can induce abortion in
women up to 9 weeks pregnant.
This compound gets the first part of its name from the French company, Roussel
Uclaf, which first developed the abortion pill back in 1980. . . . RU486 is also known
by its generic name, mifepristone, and by Mifegyne, the name under which RU486
is marketed in Europe.
“Early Option” is the name under which it is to be sold in the United States. . . .
Bringing RU486 to the U.S.
Under the Bush administration, the FDA issued an import alert, prohibiting the
import of the drug for personal use because of safety concerns it had about the
Three days after being sworn into office,President Bill Clinton signed an
executive order directing the Department of Health and Human Services and the
FDA to take steps to promote the testing, licensing, and manufacturing of the drug
in the U.S.
~ ~ ~
Under the Clinton administration, the FDA took a very active role in efforts to
bring the drug into the U.S. In the course of carrying out the president’s
directive, the FDA:
●Actively pressured French manufacturer Roussel Uclafto submit a
●Helped negotiate the transfer of manufacturing and marketing rights from
Roussel Uclaf to the Population Council of New York once it became clear
Roussel Uclaf would not submit an application of its own.
●Allowed the Population Council to use data from foreign studies in its
marketing application, rather than require the Council to wait until it was
ready to submit data from American studies.
●Allowed the Population Council to submit its marketing application despite
not having a finalized deal with any manufacturer or any finished chemical
product from its would-be manufacturer. The FDA allowed the Population
Council to use chemical and manufacturing data from Roussel Uclaf as the
basis of the Council’s application, knowing that Roussel Uclaf would not be
●Submitted the application to an advisory panel stacked with known abortion
activists and RU486 supporters.
●Processed the application for RU486 in just six months, while potentially life
saving drugs were taking as long as 17 months to be processed.
Is that the way the drug approval process is supposed to work?
Hardly. The FDA is supposed to be an objective agency representing the health
and safety interests of the American people, not an agent for some manufacturer
or some group with an ideological or political agenda.
With all that help from the Clinton administration, what kept the drug from
being approved right away?
Perhaps even the FDA could only bend the rules so far. Having questions about the
training program and lacking any drug sample or file from the firm that was to be
the manufacturer, the best the FDA could do by the time its deadline came to rule
on the drug application was to issue an “approvable” letter … but saying final
approval would await the resolution of certain unnamed “labeling” and
Soon after the FDA issued its “approvable” letter in Sept of 1996, the Population
Council and Joseph Pike, the man chosen by the Council to set up U.S. production
of RU486 and handle financing of the project, became embroiled in controversy
when would-be investors discovered in October 1996 that Mr. Pike was a
disbarred lawyer with a criminal record.
These investors were also concerned about the unusual corporate structure Pike
established and the integrity of his financial dealings and operations.
A series of suits and countersuits between the Population Council, Mr. Pike, and the
would-be investors ensured, tying the drug’s sponsor up in court for several
Just as those suits began to be resolved in the spring of 1997, removing Pike from
day to day management of the project, the Population Council received word that
the Hungarian manufacturer, Gedeon Richter, that they had lined up to produce
the drug for the U.S., was pulling out of the deal. Gedeon Richter gave no public
reason for its withdrawal, but their pull out forced the Population Council to have
to begin their search for a manufacturer all over again, setting back the project
Why has the Population Council had such difficulty finding or keeping a
Early on, a spokesman for the Population Council indicated that several of the
major drug companies they had originally talked to didn’t want to face the internal
dissension that producing such a pill would bring. This is not surprising. Who,
having devoted their life to the production of life-saving medicines, wants suddenly
to be associated with a drug that kills little children? . . .
THE COMPANIES INVOLVED
The blanket of secrecy with which the Population Council has tried to cover all of
its activities, as well as all the mergers and acquisitions going on in the world
pharmaceutical market, make it difficult to determine precisely who is doing
Roussel Uclaf is the French pharmaceutical company which first developed RU486
in the early 1980s. They were owned, first partly, then later, wholly, by German
chemical giant Hoechst AG. Together, Roussel and Hoechst owned several
American subsidiaries — Hoechst Roussel Parmaceuticals, Copley
Pharmaceutical, and Hoechst Roussel Agri-Vet.
Under pressure from the U.S. government, Hoechst and Roussel donatedthe
American patent for RU486 to the Population Council of New York in 1994.
Roussel retained all remaining rights (those outside the US) to RU486 and
continued to manufacture the drug for European use until at least 1997.
In 1995, Hoechst purchased American drug manufacturerMarion Merrell Dow
(MMD), forming a new pharmaceutical company Hoechst Marion Roussel (HMR),
then supposed to be the world’s third largest pharmaceutical maker.
As part of the acquisition, HMR acquired several of Marion Merret Dow’s best
selling drugs such as Cardizem and Seldane, as well as rights to a new non-sedating
antihistamine being developed by MMD called Allegra.
HMR also got MMD’s manufacturer of generic drugs, The Rugby Group.
HMR sold off The Rugby Group in 1998 and Copley Pharmaceuticals in 1999.
In 1999, Hoechst and HMR merged with another European pharmaceutical giant,
Rhone Poulenc, to form Aventis.
What about the American group who received the patent? What corporate
entities has it set up to manufacture and distribute the abortion drug?
After receiving the U.S rights to RU486 … in 1994, thePopulation Council,
working with a lawyer … by the name ofJoseph Pike, set up a series of companies
to handle various aspects of the production, distribution, and marketing of RU486.
Pike and the Council first established a non-profit called Advances in Health
Technology to promote the drug and provide public education and handle doctor
training. Advances also received the license to manufacture and distribute
mifepristone which it turned around and granted as sub-licenses to two other for-profit companies set up by Pike, Danco Laboratories and Neogen Pharmaceuticals,
Pike controlled both of the sub-licensees through a company called N.D.
Management. N.D. Management, in turn, was the sole general partner of Neogen
Investors and a limited partner, along with Neogen Investors, in a group named
Neogen Holdings, LP. Neogen Holdings was the sole shareholder of Danco, while
Neogen Investors was the sole shareholder of Neogen Pharmaceuticals. Outside
investors thus gained some stake in both the abortifacient and non-abortifacient
uses of mifepristone through their participation in Neogen Investors….
Reports appearing in 1999 and 2000 have referred to the Danco Group, rather
than Advances/Neogen, as “the company licensed to market RU-486″ or the
“company sponsoring mifepristone in the United States. …
While articles have identified the Danco Group as “a start-up pharmaceutical
company” in New York (the original Danco Laboratories was set up in California and
incorporated in the Cayman Islands, these reports and others suggest that other
unnamed firms are the actual manufacturers….
The Round Table’sdriving philosophy was to have Round Tablers in positions to
formulate and carry out social policies through social institutions whereby what
Ruskin called “the masses” could be manipulated….
What then are we looking at? . . . In the Committee of 300, which has a 150-year
history, we have some of the most brilliant intellects assembled to form a
completely totalitarian, absolutely controlled “new” society — only it isn’t new,
having drawn most of its ideas from the Clubs of Cultus Diabolicus.
It strives toward a One World Government rather well described by one of its
late members, H.G. Wells, in his work commissioned by the Committee which Wells
boldly called:“THE OPEN CONSPIRACY— PLANS FOR A WORLD
It was a bold statement of intent, but not really so bold since nobody believed
Wells except the Great Superior Ones, the Anenherbes and those who were what
we would call “insiders” today. Here is an extract of what Wells proposed:
“The Open Conspiracy will appear first, I believe, as a conscious organization of
intelligent, and in some cases, wealthy men, as a movement having distinct social
and political aims…
“A One-World Government and one-unit monetary system under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists who self-select from their numbers in the form of
a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages.
“In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number
of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful
to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the
total world population.
“There shall be no middle class, only rulers and servants….
“Marriage shall be outlawed and there shall be no family life as we know it.
Children shall be removed from their parents at an early-age and brought up by
wards as state property…. Women will be degraded through the continued process
of ‘women’s liberation’ movements. Free sex shall be mandatory.
“Failure to comply at least once by the age of 20 shall be punishable by severe
reprisals against her person. Self-abortion shall be taught and practiced after two
children are born to a woman; such records shall be contained in the personal file
of each woman in the One World Government’s regional computers.
“If a woman falls pregnant after she has previously given birth to two children, she
shall be forcibly removed to an abortion clinic for such an abortion and
sterilization to be carried out….”
So much for the “Woman’s Right to Choose.”
$ $ $
BABY PARTS FOR SALE –
A BATCH OF EYES BY UPS –
30 LIVERS BY FEDEX
by J.C. Willke, MD
After fighting abortion for 30 years I thought I had seen and heard it all, but not
so. Here is a new development, a coordinated high-tech industry functioning for
the specific purpose of obtaining and selling high-quality fetal organs for research.
Partial-Birth Abortions seemed to be so horrible that most of us wondered how
such procedures could be defended. Many of us chalked it up to the fact that the
pro-abortion advocates and the abortion industry didn’t want to give one inch for
fear that their whole house of cards will fold. I, among others, felt that their
resistance to forbidding this gruesome procedure was a fear of a domino effect….
But now we have evidence of a very clear additional reason why they want these
late-term abortions to continue.
The reason is that this is the one method that gives them intact fetal bodies
from which they can obtain organs for research.
The other method of late-term abortion, D&D (Dilatation and Evacuation), involves
reaching up into the uterus and dismembering the live baby. This delivers pieces
of macerated organs that are usually unsuitable for fetal research,
transplantation, etc. This may be the main reason for their vehement defense of
the practice of Partial-Birth abortion.
The story was broken recently by Life Dynamics under the guidance of its director
Mark Crutcher. A lady came to him with a story, which he has verified. The
name of the informant cannot be revealed, as she is still involved in the work that
she has exposed….
She worked for “an outside source, hired with a team to go in [to late term
abortion clinics] to dissect and procure fetal tissue for high-quality sales.”
Read on as Kelly (not her real name) describes her macabre profession….
“What we did was to have a contract with an abortion clinic that would allow us to
go there on certain days. We would get a generated list each day to tell us what
tissue researchers, pharmaceutical companies and universities were looking for.
Then we would examine the patient charts….”
“We were looking for eyes, livers, brains, thymuses [lymphoid tissue], cardiac
blood, cord blood, blood from the liver, even blood from the limbs….”
Kelly stated, “We would sell the tissue to private contractors. They in turn would
sell to other universities and researchers. There was a high demand every week to
buy such fetal tissues. It was shipped by UPS, FedEx, Airborne and sometimes by
And then the obvious question. Kelly is still working for this company, so why did
she come and tell this story to a pro-life group?
One day she when she was working, “A set of twins at 24 weeks gestation was
brought to us in a pan. They were both alive. The doctor came back and said, ‘Got
you some good specimens, twins.’
I looked at him and said, ‘There’s something wrong here. They are moving. I don’t
do this. This is not in my contract.’…”
“I told him I would not be part of taking their lives. So he took a bottle of sterile
water and poured it in the pan until the fluid came up over their mouths and noses,
letting them drown. I left the room because I could not watch this.”
But she did go back to dissect them after they were dead. She said, “That’s when
I decided it was wrong. I did not want to be there when that happened.”
And then it happened again and again … ”At 16 weeks, all the way up to sometimes
even 30 weeks, and we had live births come back to us.”
“Then the doctor would either break the neck or take a pair of tongs and beat
the fetus until it was dead….”
She was asked if the type of abortion procedure was intentionally altered to
deliver to you an intact specimen, even if that meant giving you a live baby?
Her answer was, “Yes, that was so we could sell better tissue, so that our
company would make more money. At the end of the year, they would give
the clinic back more money because we got good specimens….”
From the Life Issues Institute, Inc., July 1999,
(Compliments of Connector and Warroom)
FAIR USE NOTICE. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts
to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific,
and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted
material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a
prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml . If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must
obtain permission from the copyright owner.